A statement issued by the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) late on Saturday has further fueled conflict between lawmakers and Minister of Justice Luo Ying-shay (羅瑩雪), with netizens accusing Luo of treating the ministry’s Web site as her personal Facebook page.
The nearly 500-word statement, titled: “Blaming others when you are wrong,” galvanized an outpouring of criticism on the Internet almost immediately after it was published on the ministry’s official Web site on Saturday evening.
Singling out New Power Party (NPP) Legislator Hsu Yung-ming (徐永明), the statement said lawmakers and political commentators were indiscriminately demanding that the government rescue Taiwanese who have been forcibly deported or face possible deportation to China from other nations, without having some basic knowledge of how cross-strait negotiations are conducted.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
“As you all know, cross-strait ties are complicated. It is not like the other side [of the Taiwan Strait] will agree to whatever we say. Just like in Taiwan, not all students listen to their professors,” the statement said.
Under the 2009 Cross-Strait Joint Crime-Fighting and Judicial Mutual Assistance Agreement (海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議), everything ranging from exchanging criminal intelligence resources and launching joint investigations to handing over evidence can only be carried out following cross-strait negotiations, the statement said.
“The ministry is not entitled to make any unilateral decisions,” it added.
The statement went on to blast lawmakers, saying they were shifting blame onto the ministry over the release of 20 Taiwanese fraud suspects deported to Taiwan from Malaysia on Friday last week due to a lack of evidence, which is still in China’s hands and has yet to be referred to Taiwanese authorities.
“These lawmakers act as if China is at the ministry’s beck and call, and have no regard for the time needed for bilateral negotiations. They denounce China, on one hand for the sake of sowing hatred and social divisions, and on the other hand, they ask the ministry to obtain relevant evidence from China,” the statement said.
“Such manipulation of populism is likely to have a disastrous effect on Taiwan. Please, lawmakers, if you truly love Taiwan, stop now before going too far. Give Taiwan a break,” it said.
Hsu was quick to respond to the statement, criticizing Luo on Facebook on Saturday for what he called her continued reluctance to reflect on her mistakes after her “sophistry and absurd stance” on China’s recent forced deportation of 45 Taiwanese from Kenya turned her into a “nationwide laughingstock.”
Luo faced a barrage of criticism and questions from lawmakers at a legislative session on Thursday last week, primarily because of her justification of China’s controversial handling of the group’s deportation, which contradicted the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ categorization of the incident as an “illegal abduction.”
“China’s Taiwan Affairs Office adopted a commanding tone after the return of the 20 Taiwanese fraud suspects, criticizing Taiwan for setting free criminals and demanding that we ‘immediately correct the mistake,’” Hsu said on Facebook.
“Instead of taking a tougher stance [against Beijing], the justice ministry chose to take issue with lawmakers. It is beyond comprehension,” Hsu said.
The NPP caucus issued a statement expressing regret over the ministry’s remarks.
“All government agencies are endeavoring to devise counter-strategies and send a negotiating delegation to China. However, the justice ministry has not only sabotaged such efforts, but has apparently attempted to use emotional rhetoric to detract public attention from its preposterous handling of the incident,” the caucus said.
Hung Chi-kune (洪智坤), a former adviser to Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), said it was clear that Luo was seeking to pick a fight with lawmakers and to turn a cross-strait issue into an internal conflict.
The ministry’s statement also triggered heated discussions on the Professional Technology Temple (PTT), the nation’s largest online academic bulletin board.
A netizen with the username “umenosola” said it was a “wonder of the world” that a ministry head would use an official government Web site like their own Facebook page, while another netizen, who went by the pseudonym “Leon419,” said that the statement revealed the ministry’s incompetence.
In a telephone interview with TVBS that was aired yesterday, Luo acknowledged that she wrote the statement, but added that she made some revisions after consulting with her colleagues.
“Of course we want to see [the deported Taiwanese returned] as soon as possible. Who does not? But you [lawmakers] cannot just pay lip service,” Luo said.
ANNOUNCEMENT: People who do not comply with the ban after a spoken warning would be reported to the police, the airport company said on Friday Taoyuan International Airport Corp on Friday announced that riding on vehicles, including scooter-suitcases (also known as “scootcases”), bicycles, scooters and skateboards, is prohibited in the airport’s terminals. Those using such vehicles should manually pull them or place them on luggage trolleys, the company said in a Facebook post. The ban intends to maintain order and protect travelers’ safety, as the airport often sees large crowds of people, it said, adding that it has stepped up publicity for the regulation, and those who do not comply after a spoken warning would be reported to the police. The company yesterday said that
QUIET START: Nearly a week after applications opened, agencies did not announce or promote the program, nor did they explain how it differed from other visitor visas Taiwan has launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program for foreign nationals from its list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts. To apply, foreign nationals must either provide proof that they have obtained a digital nomad visa issued by another country or demonstrate earnings based on age brackets, the Bureau of Consular Affairs said. Applicants aged 20 to 29 must show they earned an annual salary of at least US$20,000 or its equivalent in one of the past two years, while those aged 30 or older must provide proof they earned US$40,000 in
SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS: The suspects formed spy networks and paramilitary groups to kill government officials during a possible Chinese invasion, prosecutors said Prosecutors have indicted seven retired military officers, members of the Rehabilitation Alliance Party, for allegedly obtaining funds from China, and forming paramilitary groups and assassination squads in Taiwan to collaborate with Chinese troops in a possible war. The suspects contravened the National Security Act (國家安全法) by taking photos and drawing maps of key radar stations, missile installations and the American Institute in Taiwan’s headquarters in Taipei, prosecutors said. They allegedly prepared to collaborate with China during a possible invasion of Taiwan, prosecutors said. Retired military officer Chu Hung-i (屈宏義), 62, a Republic of China Army Academy graduate, went to China
UNITY MESSAGE: Rather than focusing on what Trump said on the campaign trail about Taiwan, Taipei should be willing to engage with the US, Pompeo said Taiwan plays a key role in Washington’s model of deterrence against China, former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo said in a speech in Taipei yesterday. During US president-elect Donald Trump’s first term, “we had developed what we believe was a pretty effective model of deterrence against adversaries who wanted to undermine the set of rules and values that the people of Taiwan and the people of the US hold dear,” Pompeo said at a forum organized by the Formosa Republican Association. “Succeeding in continuing to build this model will not solely rest at the feet of president Trump and his team,