Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) on Thursday said Beijing did not “care that much” who was in power in Taiwan, but added that as president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was elected based on Taiwan’s Constitution, she should abide by it — marking the first time that a Chinese official has publicly recognized the Constitution.
He told a forum at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies that Taiwan is China’s “internal affair” and Tsai’s election victory should not come as “too big” a surprise.
When asked how Tsai’s election would impact Beijing-Taipei relations, Wang said: “It is not in my purview or responsibility, but let me say it is just a change of government in Taiwan — it’s a result of electoral politics, it’s something natural.”
“What we care about is, once someone has come into power, how he or she handles the cross-strait relationship,” Wang said, speaking through an interpreter.
What matters most is how Tsai maintains the peaceful development of cross-strait relations, Wang said.
Wang indicated that Beijing would be watching to see if Tsai would “recommit to the political foundation of cross-strait relations — the one China principle.”
“This is what we care about,” Wang said.
He said there was still time before the transition of power on May 20 for Tsai to make that commitment.
“I hope and expect that before that time comes, the person in power in Taiwan will indicate that she wants to pursue the peaceful development of cross-strait relations and that she will accept the provision in Taiwan’s own Constitution that the mainland and Taiwan belong to one and the same China,” Wang said.
“She was elected on the basis of the current Constitution of Taiwan, which still recognizes the mainland and Taiwan as one and the same China,” he said.
“It would be difficult to imagine that someone who is elected on the basis of that Constitution should try to do anything in violation of Taiwan’s own Constitution. If she should attempt to do that, the international community will not accept it, mainland China will not accept it and the people in Taiwan will not accept it, because they want to see continued peaceful development of cross-strait relations,” Wang added.
While he carefully avoided the use of Tsai’s name, it was notable that Wang did not mention the so-called “1992 consensus,” as Chinese officials often do, and was also the first time that a Chinese official has referred to the Constitution, as opposed to referring to “Taiwan’s laws and relevant regulations.” The so-called “1992 consensus,” a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted making up in 2000, refers to a tacit understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Beijing that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Wang said Taiwanese want to see more Chinese visitors, pursue more business ties with China and live in a climate of peace and tranquility.
“The next government in Taiwan must think about these issues in a serious way,” Wang said.
Wang was ending a three-day Washington visit that included a meeting at the White House with US President Barack Obama and US National Security Advisor Susan Rice.
Wang met separately with US Secretary of State John Kerry and visited Capitol Hill for talks with members of the US Congress active in China-related issues.
Sources said that all discussions were dominated by the North Korea nuclear issue and China’s militarization of the South China Sea.
As previously reported by the Taipei Times, Wang raised the issue of Taiwan in his talks with Kerry.
Commenting on Wang’s remarks, center senior adviser for Asia Bonnie Glaser said Chinese officials have previously always insisted on referring to the “1992 consensus.”
As Tsai and her Democratic Progressive Party would not accept the “1992 consensus,” Wang’s statement might hint at a new direction in which the idea of “one China” might be achieved through the Constitution, Glaser said.
According to a report published by the Chinese-language United Evening News, former American Institute in Taiwan director Douglas Paal said his guess was that Wang’s remarks show that Beijing is unofficially consenting to Tsai’s idea of handling cross-strait issues within the framework of the Constitution.
Additional reporting by Reuters and Loa Iok-sin
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS