The US Department of State on Wednesday said it was “frankly disappointed” with President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) decision to visit Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島).
The relatively strong diplomatic reaction was given by spokesman Mark Toner at a regularly scheduled news briefing.
“We view such an action as unhelpful” and it would not contribute to the peaceful resolution of disputes in the South China Sea, he said.
Photo: CNA
“We urge Taiwan and all claimants to lower tensions, to de-
escalate tensions, rather than take actions that could possibly raise them,” Toner added.
In response to questions from the Taiwanese press, Toner said that the US had been very clear about its disagreement with China building structures on South China Sea islands.
“We want to see a halt among all claimants to further land reclamation, construction of new facilities and militarization of outposts,” which would help lower tensions and create space for peaceful resolution, he said.
Asked if Ma’s trip would harm US-Taiwan relations, Toner said: “We have very strong relations with Taiwan, but sometimes we disagree on their actions.”
Toner said the US was committed to a “one China” policy and looked forward to working with president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and building stronger relations with Taiwan, but “we disagree on this particular act.”
Toner was asked why Ma could not visit an island that Taiwan had occupied for decades and why Taiwan was not included in diplomatic discussions about the South China Sea.
“I can’t speak to whether we would invite Taiwan to take part in diplomatic conversations,” he said.
Ma had “every right” to make his position clear on the South China Sea, Toner said, adding: “We just disagree with this particular action. We view it as frankly raising tensions rather than what we want to see which is de-escalation. We want to see dialogue and welcome all voices in the region weighing in on that dialogue and it is only through a diplomatic mechanism that we can successfully resolve the South China Sea.”
He said that Taiwan is a valued partner and Washington would “continue to listen to their concerns and reflect their concerns.”
Richard Fisher, a senior fellow at the International Assessment and Strategy Center in Alexandria, Virginia, said the US statements sounded like Washington was “throwing Taiwan into the same category of aggressor as China.”
“This may be an attempt to appear neutral and to respond to Chinese criticism that Washington is always bashing China. But criticizing Taiwan will not result in China ceasing its military base building or prevent the likelihood that it will attack other islands and turn them into Chinese military bases as well,” he said
Fisher said Taiwan had sought to differentiate its methods and objectives from China.
“It is China which is clearly seeking to obtain near total control of the South China Sea, build the capability to choke off one of the world’s most important maritime commercial life lines, isolate US allies in Asia and increase its ability to threaten Taiwan,” he said.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS