President-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) yesterday said that the incumbent government needs to enter “caretaker mode” as voters expect, after President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said that the word “caretaker” is not in his dictionary.
Ma’s said that he still has four months in office and called for a Cabinet to be formed by the new majority party in the legislature.
However, Tsai said that according to the nation’s principles of constitutional operation, voters have decreed that “the incumbent government [then] enters caretaker mode.”
Photo: CNA
“Entering caretaker mode does not mean doing nothing,” Tsai said. “There are several tasks that need to be undertaken by the government. First, government operations have to be maintained; second, the political state needs to be kept stable; third, they need to facilitate a smooth transition of power.”
“It is not the first party change the nation has faced. There are precedents to be followed set in 2000, as well as 2008,” she added.
Tsai said the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is willing to assist with the transition.
“It is certainly appropriate for the Cabinet led by Premier Mao [Chi-kuo 毛治國] to stay and do the caretaker job, but if Mao decides not to, President Ma should find an experienced and trustworthy person in the Cabinet to take over operations,” she said.
Mao tendered his resignation on Saturday last week after the elections and released a statement on Thursday saying that while feeling sorry for causing trouble, his “decision to quit will not change.”
Mao said he stopped receiving a salary as of Saturday last week.
Separately yesterday, the DPP legislative caucus announced plans to carry out reforms in the legislature, focusing on issues such as: the impartiality of the legislative speaker; not blocking draft bills in the Procedure Committee, where motions get placed on the legislative agenda; refocusing the weight of legislative operations on legislative committees; committee meeting transparency; full broadcasting of legislative meetings; and the self-discipline of lawmakers.
DPP Legislator Tsai Chi-chang (蔡其昌) said that while the party had proposed various reform-related proposals, they previously had little chance of being discussed due to the party’s minority state in the legislature.
As the DPP has won the majority for the next legislature, it would pass relevant bills in the next session, he added.
DPP Legislator Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋) said that in past legislatures, the Procedure Committee was where Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) members blocked reform-related bills.
“One of our reforms is to revise Procedure Committee regulations to allow draft bills, after meeting mandatory requirements, to be directly referred to the committee for deliberation, rather than requiring the Procedure Committee’s consent,” Lee said.
The “committee-centered” legislative operation indicates that the bills could not be sent out of the committee for the general assembly’s cross-party negotiation if one-third of the clauses in the bill failed to obtain the committee’s consensus and stayed in “reserve,” Lee added.
As for lawmakers’ self-discipline, Lee said it is to prevent lawmakers having paid part-time employment.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say