In response to criticism over his meeting in Singapore with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) defended his performance while on board a flight back to Taiwan, which arrived at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport early yesterday morning.
During the flight, Ma told reporters that the most significant result of his meeting with Xi was that leaders from the two sides of the Taiwan Strait had finally met and expressed their willingness to jointly discuss relevant issues.
“There are too many problems across the Strait that need to be dealt with. While a number of them have been resolved over the past few years, there are still many left, which is why we require a communication platform at a higher level,” Ma said, adding that the meeting was just a first step.
Photo: CNA
Asked how he felt about Xi’s response to Taiwanese concern over the threat China’s military poses to Taiwan, Ma said he was “not very satisfied” with Xi’s answer that the deployments did not target Taiwan.
“I told Xi that Taiwanese are rather concerned about the issue and hope China could make some gestures of goodwill... While I am not content with Xi’s response, at least I started the dialogue and I will bring up the matter again if given the opportunity in the future,” Ma said.
Ma added that he said everything he “was supposed to say” in front of Xi, including two mentions of the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution, as well as one mention each of the ROC and “one China, different interpretations.”
Photo: Chiu I-tung, Liberty Times
However, Xi did not make any significant reactions to his references to the ROC, Ma said, adding that he did not say “ROC president” during their meeting.
Shrugging off Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) criticism of the meeting’s outcome, Ma said he had clearly mentioned “one China, different interpretations” and the so-called “1992 consensus” — a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted making up in 2000 that refers to a tacit understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese government that both sides acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
“‘One China, different interpretations’ means we can have different interpretations of the term ‘one China,’ while the ‘1992 consensus’ allows both sides to verbally state their respective interpretations of what ‘one China’ means,” Ma said.
“This is what gives us room [to maneuver]. Without this space, why would it be called the ‘1992 consensus?’” he added.
In regards to his performance at the meeting, Ma said he fulfilled nearly all of his original objectives, including bringing up the “1992 consensus”; “one China, different interpretations”; and the Constitution’s prohibition on remarks such as “two Chinas,” “one China, one Taiwan” and Taiwanese independence.
“Some have misunderstood my words as an attempt to fawn to the People’s Republic of China, but it was not. These terms are forbidden by our own Constitution,” Ma said.
Meanwhile, Premier Mao Chi-kuo (毛治國) said the Ma-Xi meeting had major historic significance, as both leaders took an important first step toward more institutionalized meetings in the future. Mao made the remarks yesterday afternoon while visiting the Taipei International Travel Fair, at which he met with travel industry representatives.
“This historic event has drawn global attention, and we, the people in Taiwan, should be united to tell the world about the importance of having peaceful cross-strait relations,” Mao said. “This is also an opportunity to let the world know about the contributions made by Taiwanese to peaceful development in the Asia-Pacific region.”
When asked if Chinese tourists would be allowed to make transit stops in Taiwan while he remains in office, Mao said that is “one of the follow-up issues that we will have to work on.”
ONE LAST TALK: While Xi said that Taiwan was a ‘red line,’ Biden, in what is likely his last meeting with Xi as president, called for an end to China’s military activity around Taiwan China’s military intimidation and economic coercion against Taiwan are the main causes of tensions that are destabilizing peace in the Taiwan Strait, Taipei said yesterday while thanking US President Joe Biden for expressing Washington’s firm stance of maintaining peace and stability in the region. Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) met on Saturday for their third meeting and their first talks in seven months on the sidelines of the APEC forum in Lima, Peru. It was likely Biden’s last meeting as president with Xi. During their conversation, Biden reiterated the US’ opposition to any unilateral change to the “status quo” from either
Taiwan would participate in the 2026 APEC summit to be hosted by China after Beijing promised it would ensure the personal safety of attendees, Taiwanese national security sources said yesterday. The APEC Leaders’ Machu Picchu Declaration announced yesterday said that China would host the APEC summit in 2026. Beijing proposed hosting the summit shortly before this year’s gathering began on Friday, a national security official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Many APEC members expressed concerns about China hosting the event and said that prior communication over the decision was insufficient, the official said. Taiwan brought up concerns about legal “guidelines” China announced in
SUPPORT: Arms sales to NATO Plus countries such as Japan, South Korea and Israel only have to be approved by the US Congress if they exceed US$25m The US should amend a law to add Taiwan to the list of “NATO Plus” allies and streamline future arms sales, a US commission said on Tuesday in its annual report to the US Congress. The recommendation was made in the annual report by the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC), which contained chapters on US-China economic and trade ties, security relations, and Taiwan and Hong Kong. In the chapter on Taiwan, the commission urged the US Congress to “amend the Arms Export Control Act of 1976 to include Taiwan on the list of ‘NATO Plus’ recipients,” referring to
Minister of Labor Ho Pei-shan (何佩珊) said she would tender her resignation following criticism of her handling of alleged bullying by Ministry of Labor Workforce Development Agency branch director Hsieh Yi-jung (謝宜容) resulting in the death of an employee. The ministry yesterday gave Hsieh two demerits and said she is subject to review by the Disciplinary Court. The severest possible punishment would be her removal from office and being barred from government jobs indefinitely. Workforce Development Agency Director-General Tsai Meng-liang (蔡孟良) also received a major demerit and was transferred to another position. Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) issued a formal apology