A protester holds a flag during a demonstration outside the Ministry of Economic Affairs in Taipei against the Singapore meeting between President Ma Ying-jeou and Chinese President Xi Jinping.
Photo: Reuters
Yesterday’s meeting between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prompted a protest outside the Presidential Office Building, with activists condemning the meeting and pledging to continue the fight against negotiations over the trade in goods agreement with China.
Photo: EPA
“The Ma-Xi meeting demonstrates that ‘one China with different interpretations’ and the [so-called] ‘1992 consensus’ are shattered, made-up constructions,” Economic Democracy Union convener Lai Chung-chiang (賴中強) said.
The “1992 consensus” is a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) in 2006 admitted to making up in 2000, referring to a tacit understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese government that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
“The Ma-Xi meeting, which adhered to the ‘one China’ principle, has definitively wounded the right of Taiwanese to reject possible futures,” Lai said, adding that civic organizations would fight a prospective trade in goods agreement and mutual establishment of representative offices, which Ma said following the meeting that he would push forward.
Photo: Reuters
Both would be opposed by civic groups as tools used by Beijing to further reunification, Lai said.
The protesters marched through downtown Taipei yesterday afternoon, blocking off lanes of traffic and shutting down roads as they weaved along a 3km route from the Ministry of Economic Affairs building and several other government offices before walking down Ketagalan Boulevard to reach the Presidential Office Building.
Before setting off, protesters shouted a series of slogans protesting the meeting and negotiations, telling Ma to “not come back” because they were willing to “give you [him] to Singapore.”
Preparations for the march were initiated several weeks ago by the Economic Democracy Union, which quickly rebranded and expanded it from a prior focus on trade in goods negotiations after the announcement last week of the Ma-Xi meeting.
Most protesters were from the more than 20 civic organizations that co-sponsored the protest, including Taiwan Association for Human Rights, Restoration of Taiwan Social Justice, Taiwan March and Democracy Tautin.
“We are concerned that the meeting will restrict future administrations [to a ‘one China’ framework], but because they will not sign a formal agreement, it is difficult for the Legislative Yuan to exercise its supervisory powers,” Restoration of Taiwan Social Justice’s research department director Lin Jia-yu (林家宇) said.
Protesters carried flags and banners of their organizations, with Taiwan Solidarity Party, New Power Party, Green Party-Social Democratic Party Alliance and Free Taiwan Party representatives bringing up the rear.
After an initial demonstration in front of the Ministry of Economic Affairs building, they wove their way through traffic to put on a short play in front of the Bureau of Foreign Trade office, with actors representing large corporations wearing masks to symbolize what they say is opaque handling of the trade in goods talks.
While negotiations would mainly benefit the paneling, automotive and petrochemical industries controlled by major companies, many small firms would be placed at a disadvantage and the Ma administration has attempted to “mask” this reality by claiming that the talks would include cosmetic facial masks — helping the small firms comprising that industry, protesters said.
The protesters moved to the Council of Agriculture building to protest a rumored opening up of agricultural markets before making their way to the front of the Presidential Office Building, where prominent figures delivered speeches condemning the meeting and the negotiations.
“We refuse to accept any results of the Ma-Xi meeting,” said Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆), a prominent leader of last year’s Sunflower movement.
The Sunflower movement saw the Legislative Yuan surrounded by thousands of protesters for weeks while Lin and other activists occupied the legislature’s main chamber to protest a service trade agreement with China.
“This reflects the consistent thinking of the Ma administration; it did not have sufficient authorization to negotiate the service trade agreement and the lack of sufficient democratic authorization is the most serious problem with the Ma-Xi meeting,” Lin said, adding that Ma had done everything he could to avoid supervision by the Legislative Yuan.
“There is still no consensus on what relationship we should maintain with China or what we imagine our future should look like,” Lin said. “However, Ma has used his identity as a president who is about to step down to frame and limit future cross-strait interactions.”
Even if the meeting did not produce a written agreement, the negotiations to arrange it should still have been subject to legislative approval, Lin said.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS