The Chinese government strongly desires that the “one China” principle be made one of the points of “consensus” to be announced after a historic meeting between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore today.
However, Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) officials said that they would prefer the meeting to be based on the so-called “1992 consensus.”
As of press time last night, the two sides were still negotiating the issue.
Photo: Hu Shun-hsiang, Taipei Times
The “1992 consensus,” a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted making up in 2000, refers to a tacit understanding between the KMT and the Chinese government that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
The meeting is the first of its kind since the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lost the Chinese Civil War in 1949 and retreated to Taiwan and its outlying islands.
Ma said the meeting with Xi would not result in any accords, or promises to sign accords of any sort, nor a joint declaration, adding that a press conference would be held after the meeting to highlight the points on which both sides had reached a consensus.
Despite the MAC’s wish to make the so-called “1992 consensus” a point to be mentioned, a poll it conducted last month showed that only 1.3 percent of 1,087 respondents supported making the “1992 consensus” one of the issues to be talked about by the heads of state.
MAC Minister Andrew Hsia (夏立言) said that details were still being hashed out and whether the “one China” principle would make it onto the list of points of consensus would be made known today.
Hsia arrived in Singapore on Thursday and praised the facilities at the Shangri-La Hotel after inspecting the location where the meeting is to take place, adding that he would be conducting a final check today.
Hsia said that the meeting would be on equal terms and there would be no issue of Taiwan being the lesser partner in any way.
Hsia said Xi would not be attending the post-meeting press conference as it was the Chinese custom, as could be seen from Taiwan Affairs Office Minister Zhang Zhijun’s (張志軍) absence from previous post-meeting press conferences.
Meanwhile, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chinese Affairs Division director Chao Tien-lin (趙天麟) said that he hoped Ma would uphold Taiwan’s dignity.
Chao said Taiwanese are not against cross-strait interaction, but such interaction must be based on the prerequisites of dignity, transparency and non-political motives.
That is the basic stance of the DPP on cross-strait interaction, seeing as how democracy and the public will are the key supports on which cross-strait interaction rests, Chao said.
Democratic procedures and ample negotiation with the public on the intentions of a meeting would to a great extent assuage public anxiety, Chao said.
Cross-strait relations should no longer be considered on the basis of benefiting a particular party or the manipulation of elections, Chao said.
The DPP hopes that Ma will be able to uphold these three tenets and not sacrifice Taiwan’s sovereignty, Chao said.
Chao said that while the DPP is not inclined to plan any rallies or protests against the meeting, public will in a democratic society has its own way of manifesting opposition.
Additional reporting by CNA
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS