In an apparent rebuttal to Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), the party’s likely presidential candidate, said that she has the final say on whether she is to visit Washington and on her stance on cross-strait issues.
Chu yesterday morning said that the KMT would arrange for Hung to visit the US in August or September if the party’s national congress endorses her nomination next month, despite Hung seeming reluctant to visit the US.
However, Hung issued a statement in the afternoon saying her campaign team would take into account two factors — whether it would be in the nation’s interests and whether time permits — before a decision would be made on the matter.
Photo: Chen Wei-tsung, Taipei Times
Hung appeared to be put on the spot with questions of her intent to visit the US, primarily to exchange views over cross-strait issues, as Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential nominee Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) recently did, after American Institute in Taiwan Director Kin Moy on Wednesday said, in response to media inquiries, that the US would welcome a visit by Hung and accord her the same courtesy as her DPP counterpart.
Having said on Thursday that she was “hesitant” and “reluctant” about visiting Washington, despite being repeatedly urged by Chu to do so, also asking why she should bother “if [the US] will not show a higher level of courtesy” toward her than to Tsai, when she was asked to respond to Moy’s remarks, Hung said on Friday that her earlier remarks were “coy” and of a “joking nature.”
Hung said on Friday that she would be “willing to reconsider” a trip to Washington if the US side invites her with good intentions, but her previous statements have prompted heated discussion among political commentators.
In an article published by the Chinese-language Apple Daily on Friday, Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) said Hung should visit the US as soon as possible, before the US Congress adjourns for the summer.
Now that Moy has extended a welcome, Hung should not be hesitant, Jaw wrote.
Jaw said that Hung should communicate with US government officials, senators, representatives and media to clarify that she would push for economic cooperation across the Taiwan Strait, rather than unification.
Hung should consider a visit to the US an opportunity to make friends and share her views with the US, given that the US’ acquaintance with her is limited, and to enhance her understanding of international affairs, Jaw wrote.
US-based Chinese writer and democracy advocate Yu Jie (余杰), in an article published on news Web site Newtalk, said that if Hung goes to Washington, she would not have as much success as Tsai did.
With China growing more assertive and the US focusing more on East Asia, the US would not tilt in favor of the KMT this time as it did in the 2012 presidential election amid worries that a change of government might create tensions in cross-strait relations when it was then preoccupied with the Middle East, Yu said.
Amid rising US-China tensions, the US has lost trust in the KMT because of the party’s extreme pro-China agenda, Yu said.
Chu yesterday attempted to shift attention away from the topic, saying that Hung was just speaking “in a light, humorous tone” when she made the remarks that suggested she was unwilling to visit the US.
Hung’s statement yesterday was described by media as a “slap in Chu’s face.”
From now on, if any discrepancy arises between the KMT and Hung’s campaign team with regard to whether to a US visit or cross-strait issues, what Hung or her spokesperson says should prevail, the statement read.
Hung said she would set up a meeting with Moy after the party congress to discuss the “triangular relationship of the US, the Republic of China and mainland China.”
She added that her advisers on diplomacy, including former ministers of foreign affairs, Chen Chien-jen (程建人) and Francisco Ou (歐鴻練), would stay in close contact with the US to help it understand her cross-strait policy and provide answers should it have any questions.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS