Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) yesterday accused the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of being undemocratic when it comes to dealing with cross-strait relations, following KMT and Presidential Office criticism of her China policy.
“We are a nation, we are a democracy, and cross-strait relations should be handled on a government-to-government basis, with the government taking the lead, not a political party taking the lead through secret negotiations,” Tsai said yesterday. “What happens now is just the opposite: The KMT first reaches an agreement with China, and connives in every way possible to force [Taiwan’s] government and the public to accept it.”
“This is not the decisionmaking process that the public would expect in a democracy,” she added.
Tsai was responding to criticism from the KMT and the Presidential Office of her earlier remarks that the KMT has turned cross-strait relations into party-to-party relations with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
KMT spokesman Yang Wei-chung (楊偉中) on Friday night said that Tsai’s remarks were baseless, adding that — for the KMT — cross-strait relations have always been between “Taiwan and the mainland,” as well as between “the people of Taiwan and the people of the mainland.”
He said that Tsai was unable to offer a more forward-looking and responsible direction for cross-strait policy, adding that she was “twisting others’ ideas.”
Meanwhile, in addition to emphasizing that cross-strait relations are not a party-to-party issue, Presidential Office spokesman Charles Chen (陳以信) said that Tsai should understand that the “status quo” can be maintained only by recognizing the so-called “1992 consensus.”
“Tsai has just said that she would like to maintain the ‘status quo,’ but she has to understand that it is under the 1992 consensus that the peaceful and stable status quo of ‘no unification, no independence and no use of force’ is maintained,” Chen said on Friday night. “I believe that, since Tsai has served as Mainland Affairs Council minister, she certainly would not have missed such a simple thing.”
The so-called “1992 consensus” refers to a tacit agreement allegedly reached between Taiwanese and Chinese negotiators in 1992 that both sides would recognize that there is only “one China,” but each could make its own interpretation of what “China” means. Former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted in 2000 that he had made up the term “1992 consensus.”
Separately yesterday, when asked to comment on Tsai’s remarks that the KMT government has been conflating relations between the KMT and the CCP with cross-strait ties, KMT Chairman and New Taipei City Mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that it is in Taiwan’s best interest not to link party ideology to cross-strait affairs.
“Cross-strait relations should not be constrained by ideology and should be free from party or individual maneuvering,” Chu said.
Chu said cross-strait relations mean relations between Taiwan and China.
KMT-CCP relations are ties between the political parties, similar to the links between civic groups and between cities on the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, he said. People should not confuse the ties or try to “discredit” the KMT-CCP links, Chu added.
Chu also confirmed that he is to lead his party’s delegation to the KMT’s annual forum with the CCP on May 2 and May 3 in Shanghai.
He is to be the first sitting KMT chairman to visit China since 2008, when the KMT regained power.
Asked whether he would meet with Chinese President and CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping (習近平), Chu said that is another issue and will be dealt with later.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS