Legislators from across the political spectrum voiced concern over possible breaches of national security after Lao Tse-kang (勞則康), the father of disgraced 601st Air Cavalry Brigade Lieutenant Colonel Lao Nai-cheng (勞乃成), faced a legislative hearing yesterday.
Lawmakers tied Lao Tse-kang, a retired top-ranking officer who was deputy chief of staff at Army Command Headquarters, to China during the hearing where he apologized for his son’s role in allowing a group of civilians onto an air force base where they took photographs sitting in an Apache AH-64E helicopter and posted them on Facebook, an incident that has tarnished the image of the military.
At a news conference after the hearing, the senior Lao said his son would cooperate with the investigation and face any legal consequences, while asking that he be given a second chance.
Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times
However, legislators were more concerned over Lao Tse-kang’s purported links with China, asking questions regarding possible leaks of the helicopter’s hardware, software and the weapons systems.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) said she had information confirming reports by some military experts and netizens that Lao Tse-kang had intimate Chinese business ties after moving across the Strait and operating a petrochemical company there for about two decades.
“The senior Lao retired from the army in 1987 and moved to China in 1988, setting up a petrochemical company in Hangzhou City, Zhe-jiang Province,” Lo said. “However, the law says any retired military officers with previous access to materials concerning national security must wait at least two years before visiting China.”
“I find it incredulous that Lao [Tse-kang] has close business ties in China, yet his son was in charge of the most advanced weapons system in Taiwan,” she said.
“We should fully investigate this matter,” Lo added.
The petrochemical industry is highly regulated by the Chinese government, and experts and netizens have posted news reports that indicate Lao Tse-kang attended industry and political meetings in China, suggesting he has cultivated relationships in Chinese business and political circles, Lo said.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Ming-wen (陳明文) also questioned military officials at the legislative session.
“We know that Lao [Tse-kang] went to China and started a petrochemical business there after retiring,” Chen said. “Why did the military not make background checks on his son? Do you not know he is handling the most advanced US attack helicopter, which has many highly classified weapons systems?”
“With his father’s good relationships in China, many people believe there is a chance that Lao Nai-cheng leaked classified military information to China,” Chen said. “His family’s connections in China cannot be discounted.”
“I see this is a very dangerous situation,” he added. “I see that the military has been too lax and negligent in protecting national security.”
KMT Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君) said that when Lao Nai-cheng took the Apache’s interactive helmet off the base to wear at a party, there was a risk that signals it emitted could be picked up over a smartphone app and passed on to Beijing.
China is famous for stealing technology and building copies through reverse engineering, Ma said.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say