Taiwan’s letter of intent to become a founding member of China’s proposed Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) was signed by Minister of Finance Chang Sheng-ford (張盛和), but lacked his full title as minister of finance beneath his signature.
A copy of the cover letter and the letter of intent shown at a news conference, hosted by Chang and Mainland Affairs Council Minister Andrew Hsia (夏立言) at 10:50pm on Tuesday, showed that neither was printed on government letterhead stationery, while the official name of the nation and the ministry were also absent.
Chang told reporters after the briefing that ministry’s emblem was originally printed on the letters, but was taken out after discussions between the council and China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) regarding the application.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
In response to questions as to why the nation’s name was not mentioned and in what capacity he wrote the letters, Chang said he signed the letter as “minister,” and not in his personal capacity.
Several Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers yesterday condemned the government for denigrating the nation’s status by omitting its name in the letters.
“Not only was the Chang’s official title not used, but the name of the Republic of China [ROC] was not included as part of the ministry’s address in the contact information. It was a complete denigration of the nation,” DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said.
Chen said that the ministry’s address was written as — 2, Aiguo W Road, Taipei, Taiwan, 10066 — meant that Taiwan was not treated as a nation, but rather as a region of China, because otherwise the postal code should have been placed before Taiwan, as is the norm.
Making a pun of buzhang (minister, 部長), DPP Legislator Huang Wei-che (黃偉哲) asked if “Chang was the buzhang of a xiaochibu [refreshment stand, 小吃部] or of a lifabu [hair salon, 理髮部].”
However, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) said the ambiguous term of “minister” was a way to address Chang that was acceptable to China and upheld the nation’s dignity.
China would have rejected the application had the letters been signed by Chang as “Minister of Finance, Republic of China,” Lai said.
“‘Minister’ suggested that he was a minister from Taiwan,” he added.
According to the council, copies of the letters were faxed to the TAO at about 7pm on Tuesday, while the Ministry of Finance faxed another set of copies to the AIIB’s Interim Secretariat at about 9pm after the council acquired its contact information from the TAO.
The Ministry of Finance transmitting the letters directly to the AIIB was in reaction to public uproar against President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) decision at a national security meeting on Monday to have the application filed through the TAO.
TAO spokesperson Ma Xiaoguang (馬曉光) yesterday told a news conference in Beijing that the agency had received Taiwan’s letter of intent and welcomed its participation under the “proper name.”
However, as of press time last night, the Chinese Ministry of Finance, which updates data on AIIB membership applications on its Web site by issuing a welcome note to applicants, had not published information about Taiwan’s application.
Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying (華春瑩) on Tuesday said that Taiwan’s application to join the AIIB “should avoid the issues of “two Chinas,” or “one China, one Taiwan.”
In Taipei, DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) yesterday panned the government’s decision to submit its application through the TAO, calling it degrading.
Taiwan’s entry into an international organization is a serious issue that requires a complete and professional assessment, as well as communication with the legislature and the public, she said.
“The government’s decision to apply to join the AIIB has been rather hasty, as it lacks prior assessment,” she said.
“The decisionmaking process is opaque and disrespectful to the legislature,” Tsai said.
“There is so much opposition from the public, because the government has made an international matter a cross-strait one,” she added.
Tsai said the AIIB is an international organization with its own preparatory office, making the Presidential Office’s decision to ask the council to submit the application via the TAO seriously degrading to the nation.
“The government has set a very bad example,” Tsai said.
“It is unimaginable that the KMT government would still make such a mistake after being in power for seven years,” the DPP chairperson added.
Additional reporting by Loa Iok-sin and CNA
This story has been corrected since it was first published.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS