About 40 members of the Restoration of Taiwan Social Justice group clashed with police yesterday after staging a surprise protest against a controversial Chinese flight route at the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) offices, calling on MAC Minister Andrew Hsia (夏立言) to step down.
The M503 flight route — which runs close to the median line of the Taiwan Strait and is scheduled to be inaugurated on Sunday — has come under heavy criticism from many in Taiwan.
Critics say that it could endanger national security and that it circumvents legislative oversight.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
The route was an arbitrary announcement by China, the group’s chief executive, Lin Yu-lun (林于倫), said, adding that even after negotiations with President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, Beijing only agreed to move the flight route westward by 6 nautical miles (11km), placing it 10.2 nautical miles from the median line of the Taiwan Strait.
The route is not an “international civilian route with no flight security risks,” Lin said, adding that it is a Chinese ploy to turn the Taiwan Strait into Chinese territorial waters.
It is difficult to continue to have faith in the council’s slogan touting itself as the gatekeeper of Taiwan in light of the government’s pursuit of China-friendly policies and its acceptance of a policy that seriously undermines Taiwanese sovereignty, Lin said.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
Protesters scuffled briefly with police before being forced outside, where they gathered until a council representative accepted a letter of protest.
Lin demanded that the council issue a response no later than today or the group would launch a larger-scale demonstration.
Separately, National Security Bureau Director-General Lee Shying-jow (李翔宙) said that public fears that the People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) would conduct regular patrols west of the median line after the M503 route is launched are unfounded.
Having international flight routes close to the median line of the Taiwan Strait means that the PLAAF would keep its patrols even closer to the Chinese coast, giving Taiwan more room in terms of response time, Lee told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee.
Critics of the M503 route have said the normalization of the route would mean increased PLAAF patrols west of the median line.
Lee said that incidences of Chinese jets breaching the median line were dealt with on a “case-by-case basis.”
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lin Yu-fang (林郁方) rejected the claim, saying that since former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) sparked tensions by defining the cross-strait relationship as a “special state-to-state” relationship in 1999, the PLAAF has flown 1,100 patrols near the median line each year.
The continued provocation by Chinese jets west of the median line are not “case-by-case” incidents, Lin said, asking Lee whether the M503 route forcing the Chinese jets to retreat from the median line was what he meant by a successful negotiation.
Lee said that since 1999, China has presumably extended patrol parameters from 10 nautical miles from the coast to just west of the median line, adding that there are six to 12, or even 18 to 24, Chinese jets patrolling per day.
With its domestic A470 flight route heavily congested and Beijing agreeing to move the M503 path westward, the world can see that the Chinese have turned what was once combat patrol airspace into international commercial airspace, Lee said.
The westward shift of the PLAAF patrol routes means that Taiwan would gain significant anti-aircraft warning time, Lee said.
Additional reporting by CNA AND AFP
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say