The Ministry of Science and Technology yesterday said that leading international scientific journal Nature Nanotechnology has decided to retract from its Web site an article penned by National Chiao Tung University professor Steven Huang (黃國華) and his student Chen Yu-hsiun (陳昱勳) on DNA polymerase genome sequencing over doubts from international academic circles about the validity of the pair’s research.
Deputy Minister of Science and Technology Lin Yi-bing (林一平) said the ministry earlier this week received an e-mail from the journal’s staff about the decision.
He said that an ad hoc task force at the ministry probing the case deemed the research “highly likely to be forged” and has made a suggestion to the ministry’s academic ethics committee to punish Huang and Chen, asking that the pair’s right to apply for any further project overseen by the ministry be suspended for 10 years and five years respectively.
Screen grab from Nature Nanotechnology Web site
“Huang and Chen were unable to replicate the results of their project and failed to present the tools they claimed to use,” Lin said.
Arrangements are being made for the committee to convene, and the pulling of the pair’s article would greatly influence the verdict; however, it is still premature for any conclusions to be made, he said.
Huang and Chen last year submitted the writing on their research, which Huang claimed would greatly speed up the process of virus genome sequencing — from at least one day for every virus to one hour — thus significantly reducing the time and cost required for developing new vaccines and antivirals.
Huang said that his method was “more affordable, accurate and faster” compared with traditional means.
However, since the duo’s research was published by the journal in May last year, academics worldwide have called into question its methodology and legitimacy, saying that its results were “too perfect.”
“The data looks so good that others are wondering whether [the] researchers had help from God. If not, their paper would be worthy of Nobel Prizes from all branches of science. Strangely none of those critical breakthroughs are described in the paper,” said an unnamed contributor on online bioinformatics blog Homolog.us.
Other critics of the allegedly forged research include US scientist Stuart Lindsay, a professor of single molecule biophysics at Arizona State University, who questioned the “superconducting materials” the duo claimed to use to simulate the qualities of DNA polymerases — enzymes in human cells that are essential for DNA replication — saying: “None of us know of a superconducting material that works at the same temperature as a polymerase.”
Superconductors work at temperatures well below freezing, with even superconductors that operate at higher temperatures only beginning to react at about -135?C, while polymerases generally operate at about room temperature, he said.
Huang and Chen could not be reached for comment.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or