The author of a book on live organ harvesting, Ethan Gutmann, denied that he had alleged that independent Taipei mayoral candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was an “organ broker,” adding that the accusations were likely caused by a misunderstanding.
“We take Dr Ko’s concerns very seriously and we have reviewed the relevant pages in his [Gutmann’s] book together with our own records of interviews and notes on which those pages were based,” Clive Ansley, Gutmann’s attorney, said in a letter to Ko. “We have concluded that the entire misunderstanding and the reckless accusations which have appeared in the Taiwan[ese] media would appear to be based on language and cultural differences between the English in Mr Gutmann’s book, on the one hand, and the understanding of the relevant pages when the latter have been rendered into Chinese.”
The letter was written in response to allegations by Chinese Nationalisty Party (KMT) Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) that Gutmann’s book The Slaughter: Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting and China’s Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem says that Ko agreed to purchase human organs from China.
Ko immediately rebutted the allegations, saying that while overseeing post-transplant care at the hospital he had not conducted transplants, nor bought or sold human organs in China, adding that he merely told Gutmann in an interview in 2007 that there were some doctors in Taiwan who had been involved in the buying or selling of organs for transplant, but that he was not one of them.
Ansley backed Ko in his letter.
He wrote that, after a careful review of the relevant pages, he concluded that “no English-speaking reader has understood the caption or the text to mean anything other than that Dr Ko was being given information, rather than making a statement about the availability of Falun Gong organs in some sort of personal ‘organ broker’ deal.”
“No English-speaking reader to date has understood for one moment that Dr Ko was acting as an ‘organ broker,’” Ansley said. “No English-speaking reader to date believes that Dr Ko was trying to purchase organs himself or was in any way involved in any sort of profit-making venture.”
“We believe that language, translation and the heated environment of the political campaign for the mayoral race in Taipei may be playing a role in misconstruing the author’s intentions and clouding the issue,” he added.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS