Former National Security Council (NSC) deputy secretary-general Chang Jung-feng (張榮豐) yesterday criticized current council head King Pu-tsung’s (金溥聰) visits last month to local intelligence units, calling them the beginning of the collapse of the national security system.
Chang’s criticism follows former council secretary-general Ting Yu-chou’s (丁渝洲) comments a day earlier accusing King of over-reaching his authority and questioning President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) over-reliance on his confidants.
To understand the gravity of King’s actions requires an understanding of how the presidential decisionmaking process works, Chang said.
Photo: Taipei Times
The council, formally institutionalized on Dec. 30, 1993, is patterned after the US’ National Security Council — a government body that aids the president in policy and decisionmaking, Chang said.
The presidential decisionmaking process consists of four steps: analyzing the problem; coming up with possible solutions; making the decision; and executing and supervising it, he said.
The council’s role involves the first two, which is to aid the president in making decisions on cross-strait, national defense and diplomatic affairs, Chang said, adding that during former president Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) term, it was strictly forbidden for the council to intervene in domestic affairs.
The fact that the council is responsible only for problem analysis and offering potential solutions — but not decisionmaking — is the reason it is called an “aiding and counseling” body, Chang said.
Chang said the decisionmaking process is completed by the president holding a national security conference. After reaching a decision, the president would then appoint an official to oversee policy implementation. The person in charge — who might be the NSC secretary-general, the premier, or the Mainland Affairs Council minister — varies in accordance with the nature of the mission.
The NSC would need, for problem-solving, the ministries, other councils and the National Security Bureau (NSB) to provide information about the mission or policy, Chang said, adding that the NSB in turn has six major intelligence units responsible for gathering information.
All information would be processed and appraised by the NSB for the president to make decisions and for the NSC to analyze the problem.
Chang said that if King could “visit” the six major intelligence units whenever he wants to just to show them “who’s the boss,” that would be interference with the functions of the other units.
This could give rise to inter-unit infighting as some attempt to curry favor with the “boss,” which in turn would hamper their ability to fight the nation’s real enemies, he said.
With a weakened intelligence system, the NSC, Ma and King would be on the receiving end of a torrent of information that they, without the requisite skills, would be unable to handle and process, rendering the information useless, he said.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or