Seven politicians and academics, headed by former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-te (施明德), yesterday unveiled the “five principles” of a proposal, named the “broad one-China framework” (大一中原則), that they say could resolve the domestic political divide and stalemated cross-strait relations.
The group crosses party lines, and includes former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Chen Ming-tung (陳明通), who served under the DPP administration, and former National Security Council secretary-general Su Chi (蘇起), who served under President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration.
Shih said the five principles include “respecting the present ‘status quo’ and not changing it unilaterally,” adding that the “status quo” is that the Republic of China (ROC) and People’s Republic of China (PRC) have coexisted since 1949, with bilateral relations seeing a gradual transformation from “fighting with each other” to “governing separately.”
Photo: CNA
The “broad one-China framework” is aimed at establishing an international legal entity — consisting of the ROC and the PRC — for resolving issues through consensus, and serving as an interim scheme, Shih said.
The two sides under the framework should strive to eliminate hostility and work together to maintain peace and safety in the region, Shih said.
Both sides should promise not to use military force or sign any military agreement that is unfavorable to the other side, and both should be allowed to join international organizations, such as the UN, and establish normal state relations with other countries, he said.
“The five principles cannot be taken apart, they are like a set meal,” Shih said.
He said the initiative was inspired by the Chinese Civil War and Taiwan’s decades-long Martial Law era that for many years created deep hostility and divisions among the people, adding that political manipulations for election purposes have led to a great division between the pan-blue and pan-green camps to the point that they cannot communicate with the other.
Beijing’s “one country, two systems” or the “Hong Kong model” under its “one China principle” would not be accepted by Taiwanese, while neither the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) “one China with different interpretations” policy or the DPP’s “ROC equals Taiwan” proposal have found support, Shih said.
The civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and KMT has led to animosity, but Taiwanese in general have no hatred toward China, so the PRC should try to understand why the Taiwanese cannot accept its claim of goodwill toward Taiwan, instead of believing that reconciliation with KMT means Beijing can take over the fate of the people of Taiwan, he said.
Su, a confidant of Ma, said that the Ma administration’s “three noes” — “no unification, no independence, no use of force”— is too passive, and could neither adapt to a changing environment nor solve future problems.
The nation’s challenges of the “big triangle” — the relations between the US, PRC and the ROC — and the “small triangle — the relations between the CCP, the KMT and the DPP — have become unstable, Su said.
Taiwan needs to initiate a creative scheme to create its own future, he said.
Responding to a question on whether the sovereignty of the PRC and the ROC under the proposed framework would be “separate” or “overlapping,” Su said that ambiguity could sometimes lead to better cross-strait relations.
“When things are explained clearer, the less flexible it is ... it would be troublesome if you only have two choices all the time … a certain amount of ambiguity is beautiful,” he said.
One of the most prominent China experts in the DPP, Chen said he thinks the five principles are a feasible compromise between the pan-blue and pan-green camps, but any proposition for improving cross-strait relations must be decided by the 23 million Taiwan ese through a national referendum.
The other five people behind the “broad one-China framework” are Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies director Andy Chang (張五岳), former DPP legislator Hong Chi-chang (洪奇昌), former minister of foreign affairs Cheng Chien-jen (程建人) and former Straits Exchange Foundation vice chairman Chiao Jen-ho (焦仁和).
Hong and Chiao are both KMT members.
Shih, who was a political prisoner for more than 25 years under the former KMT administration, resigned from the DPP in 2000.
In 2006, he helped lead protests against the DPP government of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS