The moment for constitutional refrom in Taiwan has arrived, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairperson-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said yesterday as she called for reform of the Legislative Yuan structure before changing the constitutional system, with better representation across the country that would benefit smaller political parties.
Tsai, who was elected DPP chairperson on Sunday, made public her views on constitutional reform in an articles published yesterday by the Chinese-language Apple Daily — the first time she has made clear her position on the issue.
“While many constitutional issues are awaiting solutions, the most important issue, in my view, is finding a solution to resolve the disconnect between the Legislative Yuan and public opinion,” Tsai wrote.
Photo: Chien Jung-fong, Taipei Times
Taiwan is currently in a democratic crisis where the ruling party that controls the legislative majority stands on the opposite side of the people and voters are unable to change the “status quo” with any constitutional mechanism, Tsai said.
In addition to a lack of representative democracy, she said people have no recourse to national referendums to resolve disputes due to the high threshold required.
Tsai proposed replacing the mixed-member majoritarian (MMM) system with mixed-member proportional representation (MMP), which was adopted in Germany, saying that the system would ensure that the number of seats a party receives better mirrors the proportion of votes it received.
The MMP system ensures a party’s total legislative seats, including the single-member seats and at-large seats, are proportional with its share of the vote, thus benefiting smaller parties if the threshold of party votes were lowered, while the MMM system’s methodology of calculating single-member seats and at-large seats separately works against smaller parties and is often criticized as unfair.
The system would also eliminate the current phenomenon of votes of unequal value and ensure that smaller political parties are included in the legislature, she said, adding that the DPP “has paid the price for messing up the previous round of constitutional amendments in 2005 and has to be held responsible for it.”
Lowering the threshold of a national referendum unrelated to changing the status of the country to a simple majority is also necessary for the purpose of direct democracy, Tsai said.
However, Tsai’s priorities regarding reform were questioned by several party members and academics, who said that discussion of the presidential versus parliamentary system should come before the legislature’s structure.
National Dong Hua University professor Shih Cheng-feng (施正鋒) said Tsai could intentionally sidestep the agenda because of her planned presidential bid.
Former DPP legislator Lin Cho-shui (林濁水) wrote in a column published yesterday by my-formosa.com, a news Web site, that Tsai should have approached the constitutional reform agenda with a “broader perspective” by promoting parliamentarism, which is widely supported by the public.
At a time when even the pan-blue camp supports eliminating the Control Yuan and the Examination Yuan, which means changing the separation of five powers — the core of the Constitution — Tsai should seize the opportunity to promote fundamental changes to the constitutional system, Lin said.
“[Fundamental changes] would provide more benefits to the people of Taiwan,” Lin said.
Hung Chi-kune (洪智坤), a member of the DPP’s Central Executive Committee, also questioned whether reform of the legislature and central government could be separated, saying that if Tsai intended to prioritize legislative reform, she should have proposed to limit presidential power at the same time.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS