Formosa Plastics Group (FPG, 台塑企業), the nation’s largest industrial conglomerate, yesterday said that anti-China protesters in Vietnam broke into the facilities of its division in Nhon Trach District, Dong Nai Province, on Tuesday, injuring one employee from Taiwan.
The protests were caused by China’s dispatch of an oil rig to a disputed area in the South China Sea 120km from Vietnam’s coast.
However, protesters on Tuesday either could not or did not differentiate between Taiwanese companies and Chinese ones, Hong Fu-yuan (洪福源), president of the group’s Vietnamese division, Formosa Industries Corp (台灣興業), said in Taipei yesterday.
Photo: CNA
About 300 protesters, some carrying steel bars and others on motorcycles, stormed Formosa Industries’ offices, factory and dormitory at 11:45pm on Tuesday. They stole or destroyed computer monitors and TV, as well as robbed employees of personal property, before leaving at about 4am, Hong said.
Formosa Plastics Group is one of the biggest foreign investors in Vietnam. Hong said Formosa Industries had halted its operations in Dong Nai and is assessing the damage. While major facilities were not affected, resuming operations will depend on whether the local government can offer the firm sufficient protection, he said.
“The situation was close to anarchy,” Hong said. “Since the Vietnamese government is incapable of protecting investors from abroad, we believe foreign investors will have to reconsider their future investments in the country.”
Asked about the company’s US$500 million capacity expansion plan for textile and plastics production in the area, Hong said it will re-evaluate the parts of the initiative that have not been initiated yet, without offering details.
Formosa Industries has no plan to repatriate its 200 Taiwanese employees because it is still too dangerous, he added.
Formosa Industries posts annual revenues of NT$25 billion (US$803.08 million) on average and employs 3,000 workers, Hong said.
Tire maker Cheng Shin Rubber Industrial Co (正新輪胎), which rents land from Formosa Industries in the area, said its premises were also attacked by anti-China protesters, causing it to shut its Vietnamese division down yesterday.
Cheng Shin is still assessing the damage at its Vietnamese unit, which produces 15,000 tires for motorcycles a year and posts annual revenue of NT$3 billion a year on average, or about 3 percent of the tire maker’s total revenue.
However, Advanced International Multitech Co (明安國際), which also rents land from Formosa Industries in the area to manufacture golf club heads and putters, is sending 30 of its Taiwanese staff home.
The golf equipment firm’s division in Vietnam, which generates 10 percent of its products, yesterday said it would use its Chinese plants to meet client orders.
Apparel maker Eclat Textile Co (儒鴻) also shut down five factories in southern Vietnam yesterday, but kept two in the north open.
Sales of Eclat’s Vietnamese division accounted for more than 50 percent of the company’s revenue of NT$18.14 billion last year, vice president Roger Lo (羅仁傑) said.
Eclat did not receive any report of damage at its factories, Lo said.
As for its capacity expansion drive in Nhon Trach, Lo said it will be completed by the end of this quarter as scheduled.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say