A former top US government official has warned US President Barack Obama’s administration about interfering with or putting its “thumb on the scale” during Taiwan’s next presidential election.
“It would behoove us to be truly neutral in words and deeds and actions in Taiwan’s electoral process,” former US deputy assistant secretary of state for Asia Randall Schriver said.
Schriver was alluding to an incident during the 2012 election in which a “senior US official” reportedly called the Financial Times and said Washington had “distinct doubts” that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was “willing and able” to maintain stability in cross-strait relations.
Photo: CNA
Many condemned the call as a blatant effort to undermine Tsai’s candidacy and said it cost her some support among voters.
Schriver, who now heads the Project 2049 Institute, said that during the next presidential election in Taiwan in 2016, “it is important that the [US] administration not repeat their mistake of the last election when it looked as though they were putting their thumb on the scale in favor of one party.”
He made the remarks at a conference on Taiwan co-organized by the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the Brookings Institution. The event was opened by Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office Representative Shen Lyu-shun (沈呂巡) and featured former minister of defense Andrew Yang (楊念祖) as a speaker.
At the conference, Schriver said staying neutral was “an important challenge for this [US] administration given the experiences in 2012.”
He said the upcoming election would be competitive and “we might very well be in a position where we have to deal with a Democratic Progressive Party government.”
Schriver also said it was possible that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) would meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) before the end of Ma’s second, final term in office.
“I don’t think it is entirely out of the question,” Schriver said.
However, he added that “it would be a failure of US policy” if Ma meets with Xi before talking with Obama.
Under the complex diplomatic rules that dictate the US-Taiwan relationship, Ma is not allowed to visit Washington and never speaks directly with top US officials.
Nevertheless, Schriver said a Ma-Xi summit was not “outlandish,” and that Ma and Obama could talk by telephone before the summit.
He said that given what was happening on the other side of the Strait, there was still a need for the US to give security assurances and facilitate arms sales to Taiwan.
A new arms sale would make a “political statement and [send a] signal,” Schriver said.
He said that Washington had handled Taipei’s failed bid to buy F-16C/D jets from it “poorly,” adding that the Obama administration had been disingenuous in many aspects of the attempted procurement.
Schriver said some in Washington did not think Taiwan needed the jets as they are too vulnerable to Chinese missiles, “but we don’t apply that standard to anybody else.”
“I don’t see how we can sell F-35s to Japan and yet we won’t consider selling F-16C/Ds to Taiwan because they would be vulnerable to PRC [People’s Republic of China] cruise missiles. Taiwan had done much more in terms of hardening and shelters and we are talking about a vulnerability that would only come into play in the most catastrophic situation,” he said. “This is a multi-mission platform that could be used in a variety of ways short of combat.”
Schriver said the US should also help Taiwan build indigenous submarines, urging Washington to be “out in front” on this matter and play a “very positive part” in the nation’s submarine program, since “these are badly needed systems.”
Schriver said the US’ Taiwan policy seems to be based on assumptions that are “fundamentally flawed,” in particular Washington’s apparent belief that it knows how to solve the Taiwan-China dilemma.
“I don’t think we know,” he said. “If you look at the polls, the [number of] people who say: ‘Status quo now, independence later’ continues to grow. [While the number of] people who say ‘status quo now, unification later’ continues to sink.”
“The notion that this is on a glide path and we can all have confidence in a soft landing, I don’t agree with that,” Schriver added.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS