Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) yesterday panned the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) plan to table a special statute for a referendum on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, saying it was irresponsible, cursory and concocted solely to help the DPP achieve the results that it wants.
The proposed statute would allow a referendum on the controversial project to pass with a simple majority vote. The Referendum Act (公民投票法) requires the participation of half of the nation’s eligible voters, half of whom must cast a “yes” vote for the plebiscite to be valid.
Jiang said the DPP has no “central credo” and takes referendum “as a child’s play.”
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
“On the one hand, the DPP calls for a simple majority that would leave out the [current] threshold requiring the participation of 50 percent of eligible voters. That would mean that a majority of two people voting yes to halt construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in a three-people-vote would make the referendum valid — a type of referendum that is nowhere to be seen in the world,” he said.
Accusing the DPP of having “arbitrary, inconsistent” and double standards, Jiang cited another proposal by DPP Legislator Yu Mei-nu (尤美女) that would require all agreements signed with China to be put to a “stringent” referendum.
The proposal states that a referendum on a cross-strait agreement would require the consent of three-quarters of the legislators before being put to a vote, and would require half of the nation’s 14 million eligible voters’ affirmative ballots for it to pass.
“It is the most stringent regulation we have ever seen,” he said.
Based on these two proposals, it is not hard to see that the DPP is being arbitrary in dealing with issues about the referendum system, Jiang added.
“There is no consistency in its thinking as it all depends on the issue under debate. When [the DPP] wants a referendum to pass, the threshold should be lowered; when it is a controversial issue that it wants to axe, the threshold should be raised,” Jiang said.
DPP Legislator Wu Ping-jui (吳秉叡) later rebutted Jiang’s comments, saying that Yu’s version was a recommendation by a civil group, not by the party.
Wu added that the civil version’s proposal has a high threshold because cross-strait agreements concern the nation’s sovereignty.
DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said that Jiang’s juxtaposition of the two versions of the referendum were like comparing “bananas and sunflowers,” adding that referendums involving issues relating to sovereignty and to public infrastructure were fundamentally different from the outset.
DPP Legislator Gao Jyh-peng (高志鵬) said that Jiang’s description of the DPP proposal as “a child’s play” was designed to mislead the public into thinking that the issue was merely political confrontation between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the DPP.
According to a survey conducted by the DPP on Wednesday and Thursday, 80.4 percent of the public supports holding a national referendum to resolve the decades-long controversy over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, DPP spokesperson Xavier Chang (張惇涵) said, adding that only 12.7 percent opposes the proposal.
The survey also found that 79.2 percent of respondents in New Taipei City and 85.8 percent in Taipei agree that a referendum should be held to determine whether the plant should continue, he added.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS