Sunflower movement students and other activists yesterday rejected a proposal by President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration to hold a national affairs conference on economics and trade instead of the citizens’ constitutional conference they had called for, saying it was a “typical Ma tactic of superficial promises and substantial lies.”
Student leaders and civic groups say a citizens’ constitutional conference is needed because the nation’s current constitutional crisis and malfunctioning government.
They announced “three undesirable and three demands” at a morning press conference in Taipei in response to Ma’s initiative.
Ma and Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) are at the root of the current troubles and are not qualified to convene such a conference, student leader Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆) said.
The protesters also opposed the government’s attempt to focus the meeting on trade-related issues and invite mostly business groups.
Businesspeople have been given too much influence and dominance in policymaking in the past, Lin said, adding that the reforms the protesters are demanding cover more than just trade.
The protesters said the students and civic groups in the Sunflower movement should be playing an integral role in a constitutional conference, which would focus on the constitutional system, the electoral and party system, cross-strait relations, social justice and basic human rights, among other topics.
If such a conference was held, its recommendations should be binding on government agencies and be implemented, not ignored and forgotten, they said.
The students also criticized Ma’s remarks on Tuesday about the service trade pact, which he compared to a marriage and said that “if either of the two sides was not happy with the marriage, there would always be the option of filing for divorce.”
“The comments showed that while Ma has kept saying that he was open for a bilateral dialogue, he continues to insist that the pact must not be revised and must take effect. That is exactly the opposite of what we have called for,” the Sunflower movement said in a press release.
The statement also criticized Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chang Ching-chung’s (張慶忠) decision yesterday to place the service trade pact on the agenda of a joint review committee in the Legislative Yuan.
It also expressed disappointment over KMT lawmakers’ refusal to promise that they would push for a mechanism to monitor cross-strait agreements, refrain from reviewing the pact before the mechanism is established and not boycott the legislation proposal in the legislature’s Procedure Committee.
A letter of commitment to those three demands has been signed by 48 lawmakers from the Democratic Progressive Party, the Taiwan Solidarity Union and the People First Party.
None of the KMT’s 65 legislators have signed the letter.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or