Student protesters occupying the legislative chamber in protest against the government’s handling of the cross-strait service trade pact last night denounced a press conference President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) held earlier in the day in response to their demands. The students said Ma’s comments lacked both substance and sincerity.
Student protest leader Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆) said that Ma “has apparently refused our main request, which is to institutionalize a special law for the oversight of cross-strait agreements before reviewing the cross-strait service trade pact.”
“By snubbing this demand, the Ma administration has refused the public’s right to amend or veto the agreement. Without the institutionalization of a monitoring mechanism, no one knows by what process the pact would be reviewed,” Lin said.
Photo: CNA
Ma’s response to the request for a citizens’ constitutional conference was incomplete, he said.
Lin said the conference was proposed because the country is facing a constitutional crisis brought about by “an unchecked executive power and a legislative power kidnapped by [Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)] discipline and [our] electoral system, which is unresponsive to public opinion.”
The students also criticized Ma for backing statements by Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) and National Police Agency Director-General Wang Cho-chiun’s (王卓鈞) that forcefully evicting students from the Executive Yuan early on Monday morning — an action in which scores of students and police officers were injured — had been “completely legal.”
“With none of our four requests receiving substantial and concrete promises, we will, as planned, stage a peaceful, adamant demonstration tomorrow [today], and cannot but continue our movement,” Lin said.
Chen Wei-ting (陳為廷), another student leader, said that Ma was “repeating himself.”
“What the president proposed was only allowing us to take a look at the pact, but not to review it in substantial terms [with the possibility of changing clauses],” he said. “What we are asking is to legislate first [for a cross-strait agreement oversight act] before reviewing the pact, but President Ma said the two can take place simultaneously. This will only repeat the history of KMT Legislator Chang Ching-chung’s (張慶忠) 30-second ramming-through [of the service-trade pact].”
“What we mean by ‘the retraction of the cross-strait service trade agreement’ is to have the pact sent back to the Executive Yuan and to also make room for a citizens’ constitutional conference to participate in the review process,” Chen said.
Earlier in the day, the protest leaders said that all members of the public nationwide have to stand up today for their democratic rights and the survival of their hard-won democracy.
Joined by scores of representatives of non-governmental organizations, the protesters told a morning press conference that the rally today in Taipei would be a non-violent one and they cautioned the police against going overboard to enforce the law.
As the students’ occupation of the Legislative Yuan continued into the 12th day, “the government is still ignoring our demand for the institutionalization of a cross-strait agreement oversight mechanism and responding by besmirching our cause and talking nonsense,” the students and civil groups said.
“We will show through the 3/30 Ketagalan Boulevard demonstration that we are not a minority and not a violent mob, but a group of citizens who are deeply worried about our country’s crisis of constitutionalism,” the protesters said in a statement.
The anti-“black-box” service trade pact movement has been followed and echoed by overseas Taiwanese too, they said.
The students also announced that they have established an internal deliberative mechanism to counteract and respond to the government’s future calls for communication, be they private or public.
The announcement was made in response to a hullabaloo caused by a supposedly personal meeting between one of the movement’s leaders, Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica, and Presidential Office Deputy Secretary-General Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) on Friday.
The meeting, after it was exposed, raised doubts about the secrecy of the unauthorized talk, which other student leaders did not know about.
Calling for an end to the authorities’ “private calls and unofficial release of information, and probing and dividing tactics,” civil groups and student representatives have achieved a consensus over the building up of an internal democratic decision-making mechanism to counteract the Presidential Office’s “off-the-record actions,” one of the student group’s representatives said.
The student leaders also responded to questions from the media about a possible communication between the students and President Ma Ying-jeou.
Student leader Chen said that during the previous discussion about the possible meeting, “we had lost our trust in the Ma administration.”
“We are asking Ma not to use party discipline to restrain his party’s (Chinese Nationalist Party – KMT) legislators’ reaction to the proposal of the institutionalization of a mechanism for overseeing cross-strait agreements,” Chen said. “If he cannot promise this, where is the room for discussion?”
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or