Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) met with the protesters occupying the legislature to protest the controversial cross-strait service trade pact yesterday — the fifth day of the student-led sit-in — but declined to agree to withdraw the deal or table a law monitoring future cross-strait agreements, saying that these two issues require the Executive Yuan’s and President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) involvement.
With the number of protesters surrounding the Legislative Yuan complex in Taipei in support of the student-led activists who seized the legislative chamer on Tuesday growing by the thousands each day, the premier yesterday met with protest leader Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆), a graduate student of political science at National Taiwan University, and attorney Lai Chung-chiang (賴中強).
Prior to Jiang’s arrival, Lin told the crowd that the preconditions for dialogue with the premier would be his agreeing to withdraw the service pact — which the Executive Yuan has forwarded to lawmakers for review — from the Legislative Yuan and to draft legislation on monitoring future cross-strait talks and agreements.
Photo: Liu Hsin-de, Taipei Times
“Withdraw the service trade agreement, pass the monitoring legislation,” demonstrators chanted as Jiang walked through the crowd escorted by police officers to reach the side gate of the Legislative Yuan building, where Lin and Lai were waiting.
Jiang began by dismissing rumors that the Executive Yuan has asked National Taiwan University Hospital — which is close to the legislature building — to make preparations to take in a large number of wounded as it is planning to clear the legislative floor by force.
“I’m saddened to hear these rumors, because they are baseless,” Jiang said. “The Executive Yuan has no plan to remove anyone by force and will fully respect the legislature’s prerogative to handle the situation in its own way.”
Photo: Chen Chih-chu, Taipei Times
However, the crowd was dismayed when Jiang said that the Cabinet supports the legislature’s article-by-article review of the agreement, but will not take withdraw the pact because it is “beneficial for the liberalization of the economy.”
He said there is no need to enact new laws to monitor cross-strait agreements since “the governing party [the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)] has already proposed measures pertaining to the monitoring of such agreements by the legislature and the public that are supported by Legislative Yuan Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平). Therefore, there is no need for new legislation.”
The crowd of demonstrators voiced its displeasure at the premier’s remarks by reiterating the demands, but Jiang responded that this was not a decision he could take unilaterally.
“The last thing I want to say is that the two issues you [the protesters] are concerned about not only involve the Executive Yuan, but also President Ma Ying-jeou,” Jiang said.
“We’ve all heard what the premier said, so let’s unite to call on the president to take care of the issue,” Lin replied, as the crowd started chanting for Ma to “come forward and face the matter.”
After Jiang declined to agree to the two preconditions for dialogue with Lin and Lai, the crowd thanked the premier for his time and clapped to ask him to leave.
Later yesterday, Jiang called a press conference at the Executive Yuan and read out a statement addressed to the students.
He said he was happy to see young people voicing their views on issues concerning the nation’s future, but felt sad about and could not agree with their occupying the legislative chamber and behaving in a disorderly manner.
Jiang added that his visit to the site of the protest had been approved by Ma in advance and said he regretted that the students had not given him a chance to discuss with them what he said were their “misunderstandings” of the service trade pact based on “misleading information and rumors” just because he had not agreed to the preconditions.
“There should be no premise or preconditions for talks so we can have some space for rational communication,” Jiang said.
The premier again dismissed concerns over the potential negative impacts the trade pact would have on the nation and the lack of consultations with concerned parties before it was signed.
The movement against the trade pact was attributed to opponents’ “anti-China mindsets” that made them “oppose everything related to China,” Jiang added.
“It’s not because there was anything wrong with the agreement itself or the negotiations [with China], but because of the ‘anti-China mindset,’” Jiang said, adding that this stance would render “Taiwan incapable of reaching out to the world,” as well as “cause huge damage to the country’s future.”
He called on the students to disoccupy the legislative chamber as quickly as possible since it is a “sacred and solemn” place, the law-making supremacy of which has been established by the efforts of the countless people who fought for Taiwan’s democratization.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS