The greatest danger facing Taiwan is intimidation from China, former American Institute in Taiwan chairman Richard Bush said in Washington on Tuesday.
The greatest danger was not military attack — “a bolt from the red” — but rather that Beijing might exploit its growing power to “intimidate Taiwan into submission” on China’s terms, he said.
The best thing China could do to achieve its political objective of unification would be to offer Taiwan a better deal and “create a real convergence between itself and Taiwan on fundamental issues,” said Bush, who is the director of the Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution.
However, until that happens, Taiwan has got to strengthen itself in a variety of ways, including militarily, he said.
“If Taiwan is prepared to strengthen itself in the context of a non-provocative policy towards China, I think we should continue to help, including with arms,” he told a conference at the Wilson Center covering a study, Proposals for US and Chinese Actions on Arms Sales to Taiwan, which was published by the EastWest Institute last year.
The study, reported in the Taipei Times in November last year, proposes a number of compromises, including one to “calibrate” US arms deliveries to Taiwan so that in any given calendar year the value does not exceed US$941 million. This would entail a small decrease on the inflation-adjusted average over the past 30 years.
The study also calls on China to reduce its short-range ballistic missiles now pointed at Taiwan by one-sixth.
Bush said that a major reason Taiwan was unwilling to negotiate with China was that Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula was not acceptable.
“There is a broad consensus on the island — both blues and greens — that ‘one country, two systems’ is fundamentally flawed as far as Taiwan is concerned,” he said.
“It is incompatible with Taiwan’s interests, and that would seem to be a very good reason for Taiwan[’s] leaders not to negotiate on the fundamental dispute,” he said.
The US transfer of advanced weapons has a political character for both Beijing and Taipei, he said.
“US weaponry is not trivial in a military sense,” he said. “From a US perspective, arms sales, whatever their political value to Taiwan, should also contribute to Taiwan’s ability to deter mainland attack or threat of attack.”
If the US decided to come to Taiwan’s defense in the case of such an attack, it would need Taipei to hold on “for several weeks while we did all that was needed to mount our defense,” he said.
If Taiwan has the capability to hold on, Beijing is less likely to consider an attack in the first place, he said.
“There is growing concern that Taiwan’s past defense strategy on which its arms requests to the US have been based is no longer appropriate for the threat environment — thus reducing the deterrent effect of the capabilities it has or might have,” he said.
Bush said that the danger of setting a cap on arms sales — as suggested by the study — was that the cap could become a “hard ceiling” rather than a “floating average.”
It was important to look at arms sales not in dollar terms, but in their value militarily, he said.
“How much does what we sell to Taiwan contribute to deterrence and to creating an environment in which, on the political level, the two sides can find a way to work out their differences,” he said.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS