The greatest danger facing Taiwan is intimidation from China, former American Institute in Taiwan chairman Richard Bush said in Washington on Tuesday.
The greatest danger was not military attack — “a bolt from the red” — but rather that Beijing might exploit its growing power to “intimidate Taiwan into submission” on China’s terms, he said.
The best thing China could do to achieve its political objective of unification would be to offer Taiwan a better deal and “create a real convergence between itself and Taiwan on fundamental issues,” said Bush, who is the director of the Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution.
However, until that happens, Taiwan has got to strengthen itself in a variety of ways, including militarily, he said.
“If Taiwan is prepared to strengthen itself in the context of a non-provocative policy towards China, I think we should continue to help, including with arms,” he told a conference at the Wilson Center covering a study, Proposals for US and Chinese Actions on Arms Sales to Taiwan, which was published by the EastWest Institute last year.
The study, reported in the Taipei Times in November last year, proposes a number of compromises, including one to “calibrate” US arms deliveries to Taiwan so that in any given calendar year the value does not exceed US$941 million. This would entail a small decrease on the inflation-adjusted average over the past 30 years.
The study also calls on China to reduce its short-range ballistic missiles now pointed at Taiwan by one-sixth.
Bush said that a major reason Taiwan was unwilling to negotiate with China was that Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula was not acceptable.
“There is a broad consensus on the island — both blues and greens — that ‘one country, two systems’ is fundamentally flawed as far as Taiwan is concerned,” he said.
“It is incompatible with Taiwan’s interests, and that would seem to be a very good reason for Taiwan[’s] leaders not to negotiate on the fundamental dispute,” he said.
The US transfer of advanced weapons has a political character for both Beijing and Taipei, he said.
“US weaponry is not trivial in a military sense,” he said. “From a US perspective, arms sales, whatever their political value to Taiwan, should also contribute to Taiwan’s ability to deter mainland attack or threat of attack.”
If the US decided to come to Taiwan’s defense in the case of such an attack, it would need Taipei to hold on “for several weeks while we did all that was needed to mount our defense,” he said.
If Taiwan has the capability to hold on, Beijing is less likely to consider an attack in the first place, he said.
“There is growing concern that Taiwan’s past defense strategy on which its arms requests to the US have been based is no longer appropriate for the threat environment — thus reducing the deterrent effect of the capabilities it has or might have,” he said.
Bush said that the danger of setting a cap on arms sales — as suggested by the study — was that the cap could become a “hard ceiling” rather than a “floating average.”
It was important to look at arms sales not in dollar terms, but in their value militarily, he said.
“How much does what we sell to Taiwan contribute to deterrence and to creating an environment in which, on the political level, the two sides can find a way to work out their differences,” he said.
GEARING UP: An invasion would be difficult and would strain China’s forces, but it has conducted large-scale training supporting an invasion scenario, the report said China increased its military pressure on Taiwan last year and took other steps in preparation for a potential invasion, an annual report published by the US Department of Defense on Wednesday showed. “Throughout 2023, Beijing continued to erode longstanding norms in and around Taiwan by employing a range of pressure tactics against Taiwan,” the report said, which is titled “Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China (PRC) 2024.” The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) “is preparing for a contingency to unify Taiwan with the PRC by force, if perceived as necessary by Beijing, while simultaneously deterring, delaying or denying
‘LAGGING BEHIND’: The NATO secretary-general called on democratic allies to be ‘clear-eyed’ about Beijing’s military buildup, urging them to boost military spending NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte mentioning China’s bullying of Taiwan and its ambition to reshape the global order has significance during a time when authoritarian states are continuously increasing their aggression, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) said yesterday. In a speech at the Carnegie Europe think tank in Brussels on Thursday, Rutte said Beijing is bullying Taiwan and would start to “nibble” at Taiwan if Russia benefits from a post-invasion peace deal with Ukraine. He called on democratic allies to boost defense investments and also urged NATO members to increase defense spending in the face of growing military threats from Russia
PEACEFUL RESOLUTION: A statement issued following a meeting between Australia and Britain reiterated support for Taiwan and opposition to change in the Taiwan Strait Canada should support the peaceful resolution of Taiwan’s destiny according to the will of Taiwanese, Canadian lawmakers said in a resolution marking the second anniversary of that nation’s Indo-Pacific strategy on Monday. The Canadian House of Commons committee on Canada-Chinese relations made the comment as part of 34 recommendations for the new edition of the strategy, adding that Ottawa should back Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations. Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, first published in October 2022, emphasized that the region’s security, trade, human rights, democracy and environmental protection would play a crucial role in shaping Canada’s future. The strategy called for Canada to deepen
TECH CONFERENCE: Input from industry and academic experts can contribute to future policymaking across government agencies, President William Lai said Multifunctional service robots could be the next new area in which Taiwan could play a significant role, given its strengths in chip manufacturing and software design, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) chairman and chief executive C.C. Wei (魏哲家) said yesterday. “In the past two months, our customers shared a lot of their future plans with me. Artificial intelligence [AI] and AI applications were the most talked about subjects in our conversation,” Wei said in a speech at the National Science and Technology Conference in Taipei. TSMC, the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, counts Nvidia Corp, Advanced Micro Devices Inc, Apple Inc and