Most Taiwanese academics believe that there is only a slight chance that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) will meet his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping (習近平), this year, although there are opportunities for such a meeting to occur.
The idea was expressed at a conference held by the Taiwan Competitiveness Forum at the Legislative Yuan on Friday. At the forum, academics joined in a review of cross-Taiwan Strait relations last year.
National Taiwan University political science professor Chang Ya-chung (張亞中) said that as long as the two sides insist on their separate stance on sovereignty issues, no breakthrough would be achieved on beginning cross-strait political dialogues this year and establishing a military confidence-building mechanism.
Chang added that under Ma’s three conditions for meeting with Xi, national need, support from Taiwanese and maintenance of national dignity, it is difficult to promote a meeting between Ma and Xi.
Other academics at the forum echoed his views.
However, Chang said an expected meeting between Taiwan’s Mainland Affairs Council Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) and China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Director Zhang Zhijun (張志軍) next month would play a significant role in the development of cross-strait relations.
National Chengchi University Institute of International Relations research fellow Wu Tung-yeh (吳東野) agreed, saying it is not possible for Beijing to accept a Ma-Xi meeting because Ma has been avoiding the “one China” principle and Ma’s three conditions for holding such a meeting have yet been met.
There have been suggestions in Taiwan that the APEC forum to be held in Beijing in October could provide an opportunity for the two leaders to meet for the first time as ties between Taiwan and China have improved dramatically since Ma took office in 2008.
So far, Ma has been barred from the APEC leaders’ annual summit at the insistence of the Chinese government. Meanwhile, on the expected meeting between Wang and Zhang, the MAC said in a statement issued late on Friday evening that Wang will not touch “sensitive political issues” or echo China’s talk about a “one China framework” during his upcoming visit to China.
In the statement, the MAC added that it is the government’s policy to insist on the so-called “1992 consensus” and to promote positive cross-strait interactions in a stable manner.
The “1992 consensus” refers to an alleged consensus reached between Chinese and Taiwanese negotiators during talks in Hong Kong in 1992 that there is “one China, with each side having its own interpretation.”
The MAC’s statement was issued in response to a cross-party consensus reached in the Legislative Yuan earlier in the day that sought to keep Wang on a tight leash during his visit, which is expected to take place next month.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus proposed that Wang should not embark on any negotiations, sign any papers or issue any news releases or statements on such political issues as “one China,” the “one China framework,” “one country, two regions,” “military confidence-building mechanism,” “peace agreement” or “arrangement of political relations in stages.”
The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) caucus echoed the DPP’s proposal and added that Wang should also not accept or echo claims that would put the nation’s sovereignty at risk, such as the “one China framework,” or “opposition to Taiwan independence.”
The TSU said Wang should shoulder political responsibility if he violates these provisos. The opposition party added that Wang should give a report to the legislature after he returns to Taiwan.
Some of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators endorsed the proposals by the DPP and the TSU, which the lawmakers said are to be included in the budget legislation due to come up for approval.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS