Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming’s (柯建銘) proposal to facilitate cross-strait dialogue by freezing the party’s so-called “Taiwan independence clause” was again the subject of debate among academics and party members yesterday, with former DPP lawmaker Julian Kuo (郭正亮) and National Chengchi University professor Tung Cheng-yuan (童振源) supporting the initiative.
Most DPP members, including Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), oppose the proposal, which was submitted by Ker at a meeting to discuss the party’s China policy on Thursday, saying that it betrays the party’s founding spirit.
DPP Legislator Tuan Yi-kang (段宜康) voiced his opposition to the plan on Facebook, saying that it “reflected the DPP’s dilemma over safeguarding Taiwan’s sovereignty, while fostering DPP-Chinese Communist Party dialogue, as well as its predicament of determining what its position is amid increasing bilateral exchanges.”
“The DPP wants better relations with Beijing, but has been hawkish on almost every cross-strait issue in the legislature,” Tuan said.
Kuo disagreed, writing in a post on Facebook and in a column on news site formosa.com that freezing the clause would help stabilize cross-strait ties because, by leaving certain options open, it “hints that the DPP could change the ‘status quo’ by staging a referendum on the nation’s name if it returns to power.”
Kuo urged party members to look at the proposal as a temporary freeze aimed “only at trying to rule out that establishing a new country is the only option [for the DPP],” rather than as a call to abolish the clause.
Citing anonymous sources, Kuo said the initiative represented more than just Ker’s “personal opinion” because the caucus whip had held private discussions with high-ranking party officials before he presented it on Thursday.
The proposal was likely tabled as a response to Beijing’s opposition to the “constitutionalism consensus,” which is tipped to become the DPP’s foundation for cross-strait engagement pending a series of meetings to decide the issue, Kuo added.
Tung praised Ker’s initiative as “the first step toward promoting cross-strait reconciliation” as the independence charter, which aims to establish the Republic of Taiwan (ROT), is “unfit for the current political situation and does not serve the nation’s interests.”
The professor, who served as Mainland Affairs Council deputy vice chairman during the former DPP administration, said that the “democratic Republic of China system,” which functions like all the other democracies, is the consensus of Taiwanese.
“In other words, the legitimacy of the Republic of China has been widely accepted,” he added.
The clause could mislead the public into thinking that the DPP would draft a new Constitution and push for the establishment of the ROT if it returns to power, Tung said, adding that the party neither has the desire nor the capability to establish the independent republic.
DPP Central Executive Committee member Hung Chi-kune (洪智坤) said that the party has fallen into a trap, because dialogue with the Chinese Communist Party will not happen unless Beijing accepts the DPP’s ideology and political assertions. However, the essential issue should be how the DPP can best approach engagement with the Chinese party, Hung said.
“There are other solutions to this dilemma. Safeguarding Taiwan’s sovereignty and ensuring cross-strait peace should not be on the different ends of the spectrum in a zero-sum game,” he said.
The necessity of freezing the clause is debatable, Hung said.
“If more than 70 percent of respondents prefer eventually having an independent Taiwan [as seen in a recent poll], then why is Taiwan independence a box office bomb?” he added.
CLASH OF WORDS: While China’s foreign minister insisted the US play a constructive role with China, Rubio stressed Washington’s commitment to its allies in the region The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday affirmed and welcomed US Secretary of State Marco Rubio statements expressing the US’ “serious concern over China’s coercive actions against Taiwan” and aggressive behavior in the South China Sea, in a telephone call with his Chinese counterpart. The ministry in a news release yesterday also said that the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs had stated many fallacies about Taiwan in the call. “We solemnly emphasize again that our country and the People’s Republic of China are not subordinate to each other, and it has been an objective fact for a long time, as well as
‘CHARM OFFENSIVE’: Beijing has been sending senior Chinese officials to Okinawa as part of efforts to influence public opinion against the US, the ‘Telegraph’ reported Beijing is believed to be sowing divisions in Japan’s Okinawa Prefecture to better facilitate an invasion of Taiwan, British newspaper the Telegraph reported on Saturday. Less than 750km from Taiwan, Okinawa hosts nearly 30,000 US troops who would likely “play a pivotal role should Beijing order the invasion of Taiwan,” it wrote. To prevent US intervention in an invasion, China is carrying out a “silent invasion” of Okinawa by stoking the flames of discontent among locals toward the US presence in the prefecture, it said. Beijing is also allegedly funding separatists in the region, including Chosuke Yara, the head of the Ryukyu Independence
‘ARMED GROUP’: Two defendants used Chinese funds to form the ‘Republic of China Taiwan Military Government,’ posing a threat to national security, prosecutors said A retired lieutenant general has been charged after using funds from China to recruit military personnel for an “armed” group that would assist invading Chinese forces, prosecutors said yesterday. The retired officer, Kao An-kuo (高安國), was among six people indicted for contravening the National Security Act (國家安全法), the High Prosecutors’ Office said in a statement. The group visited China multiple times, separately and together, from 2018 to last year, where they met Chinese military intelligence personnel for instructions and funding “to initiate and develop organizations for China,” prosecutors said. Their actions posed a “serious threat” to “national security and social stability,” the statement
‘INDISCRIMINATE’: The drastic changes would delay many national projects as well as undermine global confidence in Taiwan’s resolve to defend itself, the premier said The Legislative Yuan yesterday on third reading passed the central government budget for this year, cutting 6.6 percent from the Executive Yuan’s proposed expenditure — the largest in history. The budget proposal, which the Cabinet approved in August last year, set government spending at NT$3.1325 trillion (US$95.6 billion), with projected revenues of NT$3.1534 trillion — both record highs — working out to a surplus of NT$20.9 billion. On Friday last week, the opposition-led legislature voted to cut NT$93.98 billion from the budget’s general provisions. During a 20-hour continuous session from Monday until yesterday morning, they continued to slash the budgets of government agencies,
RSS