The state-run Central News Agency (CNA) and the Public Television Service (PTS) have come under fire for what opposition lawmakers say is their degeneration into Beijing mouthpieces after the agencies issued a joint call with Chinese media for the establishment of reciprocal media offices on either side of the Taiwan Strait.
The call was listed in a six-point proposal jointly issued by the representatives of more than 70 Chinese and Taiwanese media outlets after they attended a forum organized by China Central Television (CCTV) in Beijing on Sunday last week.
Among the Taiwanese representatives attending the forum were CNA chairman Chen Kuo-hsiang (陳國祥), PTS chairman Shao Yu-ming (邵玉銘) and Want Want China Times Group (旺旺中時集團) president Tsai Shao-chung (蔡紹中).
The proposal also called for the inking of a cross-strait cultural cooperation agreement; a concerted effort between Chinese and Taiwanese media to promote the “Zhonghua culture” (中華文化); and the normalization and formalization of cross-strait media exchanges.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) said CNA appears to have reduced itself to China’s mouthpiece.
“Is CNA Taiwan’s state news agency or China’s? The demands listed in the proposal do not conform with the Mainland Affairs Council’s policies, yet the news outlet still danced along with China anyway. I think the agency is confused about its role,” Chiu said.
Chiu, who is the convener of the legislature’s Education and Culture Committee, said that since CNA’s overseeing authority, the Ministry of Culture, had ostensibly failed in its duty to supervise the outlet, he would demand that it deliver a report to the committee soon.
The CNA and the PTS receive about NT$300 million and NT$900 million (US$9.9 million and US$29.9 million) in government funding each year respectively. There are also plans to allocate an extra NT$130 million to the latter next year.
DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said the proposal’s failure to make any mention of press freedom proved that cross-strait media exchanges would only subject local media to the negative impacts of China, rather than helping it exert a positive influence on the latter.
DPP Legislator Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋) said it was absurd for Taiwanese media to try to pressure the government into allowing the establishment of cross-strait media offices when what they are supposed to be doing is urging China to refrain from suppressing press freedom.
DPP Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) said that as agencies that enjoy government resources, CNA and the PTS’ cross-strait stance should be in sync with government policies.
“I am fine with these representatives attending forums and seminars [in China], but issuing a proposal telling their government what to do is [out of line],” Kuan said, adding that Minister of Culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) needed to state her view on the matter.
Chen Kuo-hsiang said he did not acknowledge the “joint statement” issued by the forum, since it was unilateral and had therefore not being properly discussed.
Shao said he attended the forum in his capacity as a media professional in a bid to better understand the development of the sector on the other side of the Strait.
The Mainland Affairs Council said CNA falls under the Ministry of Culture, but remains an autonomous news outlet and “since the agency’s managers informed the ministry of their plan to attend the Beijing forum in advance, the council will respect [their behavior] as long as no laws are broken.”
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS