Taiwan remains the most likely source of conflict between China and the US over the next few years, a survey released by the Carnegie Endowment in Washington on Thursday said.
The survey, Security Perceptions and the US-China Relationship, is a wide-ranging study of public and “elite” attitudes in both countries that are “exerting a growing influence.”
The study expresses surprise that even over the short term, most Chinese still identify Taiwan as a prime source of conflict.
This is “despite the positive state of cross-strait relations at present and the fact that the Kuomintang Party [Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)], which favors eventual reunification with the Chinese mainland, is in power,” it says.
Some Chinese experts said that respondents were not talking about the likelihood of conflict, but rather “what the cause would most likely be were such a conflict to occur.”
However, the experts “felt it highly unlikely” that any other factor besides Taiwan would bring the US into armed conflict with China.
“One Chinese participant explained that this is because China has not renounced the use of force on the Taiwan issue, but it has sworn off firing the first shot in other disputes,” the report said.
“Another Chinese elite pointed to the fact that the US would likely be unwilling to commit military force in other potential conflicts besides Taiwan, for example, with the Philippines over disputed islands in the South China Sea,” it said.
One Chinese expert said that the finding shows “how seriously the Chinese people take the Taiwan issue.”
Published jointly by Carnegie and the China Strategic Culture Promotion Association in Beijing, the report analyzes the results and policy implications of public and “elite” opinion surveys conducted by the Pew Research Center and the Research Center on Contemporary China at Peking University.
So-called “elite” respondents were well-informed individuals from government, business, academia, the military and the media.
Carnegie senior associate Michael Swaine — a specialist in US-China relations — presented the key findings reached through original surveys and workshops conducted in both countries.
The survey found there was a low level of strategic trust between the US and China “which could make bilateral relations more turbulent,” but that only a small minority saw the other country as an enemy.
“Chinese respondents — especially government elites — cited US arms sales to Taiwan as a major source of tension,” the report said.
"US elites — especially retired military officers and business elites — saw alleged Chinese cyberattacks and intellectual property infringement as particularly problematic,” it said.
Among the many recommendations: “Washington should not underestimate the significance China attaches to US arms sales to Taiwan.
“Beijing should not allow this issue to prevent it from recognizing Washington’s consistent support of the ‘one China’ policy,” it added.
The two sides should understand fully the sensitivity of the Taiwan issue and avoid sending wrong signals that negatively impact bilateral relations, it said.
“There may be room for the two sides to work together to reach an understanding on the Taiwan issue — or at least that it does not have to derail the broader relationship,” the report said.
Clear majorities of the US public said it was important that the US be tough with China on economic and trade issues (56 percent), building a strong relationship with China (55 percent) and promoting human rights (53 percent), statistics in the report showed.
Much smaller percentages of the US public said the same about advocating more freedom for Tibet (36 percent) and continuing to sell arms to Taiwan (21 percent).
US arms sales to Taiwan were regarded by a significant share (45 percent) of the Chinese public as a “very serious problem for China.” Ten percent of the US public said they had heard a lot about China-Taiwan relations, while a majority (54 percent) had heard a little and a third had heard nothing.
A strong majority of US elites favored US force if China were to attack Taiwan without the nation having made a unilateral declaration of independence, but a strong majority opposed the use of force if Taiwan were to make such a declaration.
More Chinese elites (61 percent) thought the US would use force to intervene against a Chinese attack on Taiwan without a unilateral declaration of independence than thought the US would do so if such a declaration were made (46 percent).
Chinese respondents viewed US arms sales to Taiwan as a much larger issue than Americans did.
“The Chinese saw it as a major impediment to US-China relations, whereas the Americans placed it very low on a list of bilateral priorities,” the survey said.
One American involved in the survey said arms sales continued because of pressure from the US military-industrial complex, a desire to prevent the US Congress from intervening too much in the matter, and a genuine effort to deter a military solution and maximize the possibility of a peaceful resolution to any disputes that arise.
“American elites noted that although the general public does not strongly favor US military intervention in a Taiwan conflict, this would not necessarily dictate US decision-making in the event of a conflict,” the survey said.
Both sides thought that the cybersecurity issue was to Americans what the Taiwan issue was to the Chinese.
Americans take cybersecurity very seriously, but tend to discount the importance of Taiwan arms sales, while the Chinese take the opposite view.
Each side feels that the other has cheated on these two issues and one Chinese elite suggested that if the two sides can make progress on both these matters, “the relationship could be greatly improved,” the study said.
“US elites — especially retired military officers and business elites — saw alleged Chinese cyberattacks and intellectual property infringement as particularly problematic,” it said.
Among the many recommendations: “Washington should not underestimate the significance China attaches to US arms sales to Taiwan.
“Beijing should not allow this issue to prevent it from recognizing Washington’s consistent support of the ‘one China’ policy,” it added.
The two sides should understand fully the sensitivity of the Taiwan issue and avoid sending wrong signals that negatively impact bilateral relations, it said.
“There may be room for the two sides to work together to reach an understanding on the Taiwan issue — or at least that it does not have to derail the broader relationship,” the report said.
Clear majorities of the US public said it was important that the US be tough with China on economic and trade issues (56 percent), building a strong relationship with China (55 percent) and promoting human rights (53 percent), statistics in the report showed.
Much smaller percentages of the US public said the same about advocating more freedom for Tibet (36 percent) and continuing to sell arms to Taiwan (21 percent).
US arms sales to Taiwan were regarded by a significant share (45 percent) of the Chinese public as a “very serious problem for China.” Ten percent of the US public said they had heard a lot about China-Taiwan relations, while a majority (54 percent) had heard a little and a third had heard nothing.
A strong majority of US elites favored US force if China were to attack Taiwan without the nation having made a unilateral declaration of independence, but a strong majority opposed the use of force if Taiwan were to make such a declaration.
More Chinese elites (61 percent) thought the US would use force to intervene against a Chinese attack on Taiwan without a unilateral declaration of independence than thought the US would do so if such a declaration were made (46 percent).
Chinese respondents viewed US arms sales to Taiwan as a much larger issue than Americans did.
“The Chinese saw it as a major impediment to US-China relations, whereas the Americans placed it very low on a list of bilateral priorities,” the survey said.
One American involved in the survey said arms sales continued because of pressure from the US military-industrial complex, a desire to prevent the US Congress from intervening too much in the matter, and a genuine effort to deter a military solution and maximize the possibility of a peaceful resolution to any disputes that arise.
“American elites noted that although the general public does not strongly favor US military intervention in a Taiwan conflict, this would not necessarily dictate US decision-making in the event of a conflict,” the survey said.
Both sides thought that the cybersecurity issue was to Americans what the Taiwan issue was to the Chinese.
Americans take cybersecurity very seriously, but tend to discount the importance of Taiwan arms sales, while the Chinese take the opposite view.
Each side feels that the other has cheated on these two issues and one Chinese elite suggested that if the two sides can make progress on both these matters, “the relationship could be greatly improved,” the study said.
INSURRECTION: The NSB said it found evidence the CCP was seeking snipers in Taiwan to target members of the military and foreign organizations in the event of an invasion The number of Chinese spies prosecuted in Taiwan has grown threefold over a four-year period, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said in a report released yesterday. In 2021 and 2022, 16 and 10 spies were prosecuted respectively, but that number grew to 64 last year, it said, adding that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was working with gangs in Taiwan to develop a network of armed spies. Spies in Taiwan have on behalf of the CCP used a variety of channels and methods to infiltrate all sectors of the country, and recruited Taiwanese to cooperate in developing organizations and obtaining sensitive information
Seven hundred and sixty-four foreigners were arrested last year for acting as money mules for criminals, with many entering Taiwan on a tourist visa for all-expenses-paid trips, the Criminal Investigation Bureau (CIB) said on Saturday. Although from Jan. 1 to Dec. 26 last year, 26,478 people were arrested for working as money mules, the bureau said it was particularly concerned about those entering the country as tourists or migrant workers who help criminals and scammers pick up or transfer illegally obtained money. In a report, officials divided the money mules into two groups, the first of which are foreigners, mainly from Malaysia
SILICON VALLEY HUB: The office would showcase Taiwan’s strengths in semiconductors and artificial intelligence, and help Taiwanese start-ups connect with global opportunities Taiwan has established an office in Palo Alto, one of the principal cities of Silicon Valley in California, aimed at helping Taiwanese technology start-ups gain global visibility, the National Development Council said yesterday. The “Startup Island Taiwan Silicon Valley hub” at No. 299 California Avenue is focused on “supporting start-ups and innovators by providing professional consulting, co-working spaces, and community platforms,” the council said in a post on its Web site. The office is the second overseas start-up hub established by the council, after a similar site was set up in Tokyo in September last year. Representatives from Taiwanese start-ups, local businesses and
‘DETERRENT’: US national security adviser-designate Mike Waltz said that he wants to speed up deliveries of weapons purchased by Taiwan to deter threats from China US president-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for US secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, affirmed his commitment to peace in the Taiwan Strait during his confirmation hearing in Washington on Tuesday. Hegseth called China “the most comprehensive and serious challenge to US national security” and said that he would aim to limit Beijing’s expansion in the Indo-Pacific region, Voice of America reported. He would also adhere to long-standing policies to prevent miscalculations, Hegseth added. The US Senate Armed Services Committee hearing was the first for a nominee of Trump’s incoming Cabinet, and questions mostly focused on whether he was fit for the
RSS