President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) statement that cross-strait relations are “not international relations” during his Double Ten National Day speech has further weakened Taiwan’s sovereignty and was meant as a hint for the US and Japan not to interfere in cross-strait issues, a local academic said.
“If by including such words in the National Day address Ma intends to make the cross-strait issue an internal matter and not open to international interference, it would cause serious repercussions in the days to come,” said Wong Ming-hsien (翁明賢), director of Tamkang University’s Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Pointing to the fact that Taiwan is not a part of the UN, and the Ma administration’s inclination to make the cross-strait issue an internal issue rather than international, Wong said that in the event of a military conflict over the Taiwan Strait, neither Japan nor the US would have grounds to intervene.
Photo: Lin Cheng-kung, Taipei Times
Ma’s National Day address reflects his policy directions in the two years left of his term, and Ma has to explain to the international community what he means by “cross-strait relations are not international relations,” Wong said.
“Is it like the Basic Treaty signed in 1972 by the two Germanies, in which both agreed that neither would have the right to represent the other in international affairs, and that both would be able to participate in the UN, or is it an attempt to clarify the relation of ‘on the island’ and ‘on the mainland,’ or is it a shift away from his ‘no unification, no independence, no use of force’ policy and a nod toward unification, maybe even ‘to be unified?’” Wong asked, adding that Ma has to make his intentions clear, both to Taiwanese and to the international community.
That Ma would make such a declaration at a time when his approval ratings had sunk as low as 9.2 percent perhaps shows his intention to pave the way for a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Wong said, adding that Ma’s rhetoric coincides with Xi’s comments during a meeting with former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Wu Po-hsiung (吳伯雄) in June that both sides of the Strait are Chinese by ethnicity (zhonghua minzu, 中華民族).
Wong said he believed Ma was attempting to trumpet his cross-strait policies to draw attention from his lack of domestic accomplishments.
However, Ma’s “diplomatic accomplishments” in recent years, while superficially creating the image of Taiwan being more active in international efforts, only damaged Taiwan’s status as a sovereign nation, he said.
Diplomacy is an extension of a nation’s sovereignty, but the Ma administration has set a bad example by asking for China’s agreement before applying to participate in the World Health Assembly or the International Civil Aviation Organization, Wong said, adding that the administration has caused Taiwan to become a “diplomatic sub-entity” in the international community.
If non-governmental organizations in Taiwan were to follow such a precedent, then “Taiwan would have no diplomacy to speak of,” Wong said, adding that with the Ma administration’s weakening of national defense, Taiwan may not be far from becoming the second Hong Kong or Macau.
Wong concluded with a warning that the Ma administration’s overtly pro-China policies have already worried the US, adding that the stall in US-Taiwan arms sales clearly shows that the US is standing back and observing.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS