President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has ignited a constitutional crisis with his involvement in a political vendetta against Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) that is being disguised as an influence peddling probe, and Ma owes Taiwanese an explanation, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said yesterday.
The controversy began when the Special Investigation Division (SID) launched a probe into alleged influence peddling by Wang and two other judicial officials, former minister of justice Tseng Yung-fu (曾勇夫) and Taiwan High Prosecutors’ Office Head Prosecutor Chen Shou-huang (陳守煌), in a lawsuit involving DPP Legislator Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘).
The SID’s lack of due process in information-gathering and the administrative interference of the judicial and legislative branches throughout the investigation is highly alarming, DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) said after a DPP caucus meeting yesterday.
“It seems like we are back in the White Terror era, during which the government regularly wiretapped opposition politicians... This is worse than the Watergate scandal and is unacceptable,” Su said.
The chairman added that the SID had violated confidentiality regulations by reporting the case to Ma on Aug. 30, five days before it was publicly announced at a press conference on Friday, and demanded the president disclose whatever orders he gave during the meeting.
Ma has said that Wang abusing his position was “the most shameful day in the development of Taiwan’s democracy,” but what was really shameful was how the SID illegally gathered information and how the president used the division to politically persecute Wang, the DPP said.
With regards to the allegations that Ker asked Tseng, Chen and Wang to lobby a prosecutor to refrain from appealing his acquittal in a breach of trust case, Su said the claims were unfounded because Ker had been ruled innocent, so preventing an appeal was unnecessary.
In his first public appearance after the SID’s Friday announcement, Ker yesterday told a press conference he would tackle the claims head-on because they had been a political witch hunt from the beginning.
Ker denied that he asked Wang to lobby for him, but said he was sorry the legislative speaker was involved in the scandal.
DPP Legislator Wu Ping-jui (吳秉叡) said that ironically, a group of Chinse Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers in 2007 did exactly what Wang has been accused of doing, when they lobbied for Ma after he was charged with embezzling his special allowance as Taipei mayor.
Wu said that then-KMT caucus whip Tseng Yung-chuan (曾永權) visited then-prosecutor-general Chen Tsung-ming (陳聰明) with a group of KMT lawmakers on Aug. 16, 2007 — one day after Ma was found not guilty — and asked Chen to urge prosecutor Hou Kuan-jen (侯寬仁) not to appeal the case.
“Judging by Ma’s standards, if that was not influence peddling, then what is?” Wu said.
The DPP has agreed to adopt a “wait-and-see” approach to the case, with caucus director-general Gao Jyh-peng (高志鵬) saying that the party’s next move would depend on Ma and Wang’s reactions, amid rumors that the latter may be stripped of his KMT membership and position after he returns from Malaysia today.
Ex-DPP chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that a president making such accusations for political persecution was a “national tragedy.”
“The president has resorted to extreme measures, using illegally-obtained and unverified evidence to carry out political persecutions and divide the opposition so he can reap political gains,” she said. “A leader like this is no longer fit to govern.”
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS