A draft act to allow Taiwan and China to establish representative offices in each other’s countries failed to pass its initial legislative committee review yesterday as opposition parties paralyzed the Internal Administration Committee meeting, while Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers also voiced dissatisfaction with the negotiations.
The establishment of representative offices in Taiwan and China will be addressed in the ninth round of cross-strait talks between the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS) today in Shanghai. The foundation and ARATS will also sign a cross-strait service trade agreement during the negotiations.
The Internal Administration Committee was at 9am to begin review of legislation to allow Taiwan and China to create representative offices in each other’s countries. However, lawmakers from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Taiwan Solidarity Union and People First Party (PFP) arrived outside the meeting room at 7am, long before most KMT legislators arrived, at about 8:30am.
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
As soon as the room’s door was opened, opposition lawmakers rushed to occupy the podium to prevent the meeting from starting, and they succeeded in stalling the proceedings all day.
“A few days after a meeting between KMT Chairman Wu Po-hsiung (吳伯雄) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) during which Wu and Xi agreed on the ‘one China’ principle and creating representative offices, the government is pushing through legislation for it,” DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) said of the reason behind the caucus’ boycott. “However, the Mainland Affairs Council has yet to brief us on the ongoing talks about creating representative offices, so passing the legislation now would be like giving it a blank check.”
DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) also accused President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration of “asking the Legislative Yuan for a blank check” for the establishment of cross-strait representative offices before bilateral negotiations are completed.
It is essential for Taipei to have visitation rights to Taiwanese detained in China and the authorization to issue travel documents, but the administration demanded that the legislation be passed without the legislature knowing Beijing’s position on the matter, which was why the DPP would not accept the request before the negotiations are completed, Su said.
Meanwhile, the PFP issued a statement saying that while it supports enhancing cross-strait ties, “we do not agree with President Ma Ying-jeou’s handling of cross-strait talks, which has made cross-strait exchanges a business of his own and of his party.”
KMT caucus whip Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) condemned the boycott as “unreasonable” and “irrational,” but added at a separate setting that the KMT caucus was also dissatisfied that the council is unable to convince China to grant Taipei visitation rights to Taiwanese detained or jailed in China.
“There are at least 1,000 Taiwanese being detained or imprisoned in China. I think it’s entirely reasonable to ask China to allow officials from Taiwan’s representative office in China to visit them,” KMT Legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) told a press conference at the KMT caucus office in the presence of Mainland Affairs Council Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦).
“Without the right to humanitarian visits being included in the agreement, the KMT caucus will not support the draft bill either,” he said.
Wang did not give a firm, positive response.
“We will try our best to secure visitation rights, but I must say that the right to humanitarian visits is one thing for which Chinese negotiators have not shown any sign of agreeing to yet,” Wang said. “However, I fully understand the expectations from the government and from the KMT caucus.”
Ma says the establishment of representative offices for cross-strait exchanges is crucial and will serve more than 8 million people and facilitate NT$16 million (US$530,000) worth of trade.
“The two sides of the Taiwan Strait will deepen cross-strait exchanges, and it will be difficult to continue such exchanges without representative offices,” Ma said yesterday at the KMT headquarters.
Ma, who is also KMT chairman, pledged to enhance cross-strait exchanges if he is re-elected as the party’s chairman next month, while promising to promote regional peace in East Asia.
He declined to confirm whether he would visit China in his capacity as KMT chairman after completing his final term as president in 2016, and insisted that cross-strait development will continue to move forward.
“We have accomplished great achievements in cross-strait relations over the past five years and I believe the two sides of the Taiwan Strait cherish such fruitful results… Cross-strait exchanges will definitely continue to expand and deepen,” he said.
He said the government would conduct a thorough review of the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) to facilitate cross-strait exchanges.
Additional reporting by Mo Yan-chih and Chris Wang
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS