The pan-green camp yesterday reiterated its support of the government’s tough stance and sanctions against the Philippines over the killing of a Taiwanese fisherman, but said that the inconsistent position of the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in bilateral negotiations has been questionable.
The government recognized the Philippines’ “positive response” at a press conference called at 1am yesterday morning after five hours of negotiation, but subsequently changed its rhetoric, saying that Manila’s response was insincere as it announced a series of sanctions at 10am and 6pm yesterday.
The about-face within the span of several hours was puzzling and showed the differences between and the chaotic decisionmaking process of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the National Security Council, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Department of International Affairs director Liu Shih-chung (劉世忠).
The remarks of Philippine Representative to Taiwan Antonio Basilio, who said the people of the Philippines — rather than the Philippine government — expressed deep regret and apologized for the unfortunate event, was unacceptable, Liu said, adding that the appearance of Basilio and Foreign Minister David Lin (林永樂) did indicate a reciprocal response.
If Taiwan was not satisfied with the results of the negotiations, it should have immediately terminated the talks, Liu said.
Manila has neither offered a formal and official apology, nor has it provided a definite date to complete the investigation into the incident and identify the perpetrators, he added.
“We are not satisfied with and will not accept [Manila’s response], and we will not compromise,” Liu said yesterday morning about the bilateral negotiations.
DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) added that Taiwan’s outrage should be directed at the Philippine government rather than Philippine migrant workers in Taiwan because the fisherman was shot dead by Philippine civil servants.
At a separate press conference, DPP Legislator Pan Men-an (潘孟安) blasted Lin for “serving as a translator for Basilio and trying to find an excuse for the Philippines” at the 1am press conference.
The DPP legislative caucus also urged Taiwanese to refrain from venting their anger at Philippine workers in Taiwan and called for the government to maintain its strong stance by regularly sending naval vessels to escort Taiwanese fishing boats in the Bashi Channel and by expanding the navy’s and the coast guard’s patrol area beyond the current temporary enforcement line.
DPP lawmakers Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) and Tsai Chi-chang (蔡其昌), meanwhile, said that Taipei’s sanctions against Manila, which include freezing the hiring of Philippine workers and suspending bilateral tourism, trade and technology exchanges, would be meaningful.
Separately, Taiwan Solidarity Union Legislator Hsu Chung-hsin (許忠信) condemned Manila for citing the so-called “one China” policy as its guideline for handling the diplomatic row.
The “one China” policy was why Manila chose to apologize to Taiwanese rather than the government, Hsu said.
Manila has never offered concrete pledges on a bilateral fisheries negotiation and its lack of sincerity toward the victim’s family was demonstrated by its offer of compensation from private donations rather than the Philippine government, the lawmaker said.
CELEBRATION: The PRC turned 75 on Oct. 1, but the Republic of China is older. The PRC could never be the homeland of the people of the ROC, Lai said The People’s Republic of China (PRC) could not be the “motherland” of the people of the Republic of China (ROC), President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks in a speech at a Double Ten National Day gala in Taipei, which is part of National Day celebrations that are to culminate in a fireworks display in Yunlin County on Thursday night next week. Lai wished the country a happy birthday and called on attendees to enjoy the performances and activities while keeping in mind that the ROC is a sovereign and independent nation. He appealed for everyone to always love their
‘EXTREME PRESSURE’: Beijing’s goal is to ‘force Taiwan to make mistakes,’ Admiral Tang Hua said, adding that mishaps could serve as ‘excuses’ for launching a blockade China’s authoritarian expansionism threatens not only Taiwan, but the rules-based international order, the navy said yesterday, after its top commander said in an interview that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could blockade the nation at will. The object of Beijing’s expansionist activities is not limited to Taiwan and its use of pressure is not confined to specific political groups or people, the navy said in a statement. China utilizes a mixture of cognitive warfare and “gray zone” military activities to pressure Taiwan, the navy said, adding that PLA sea and air forces are compressing the nation’s defensive depth. The navy continues to
MAKING PROGRESS: Officials and industry leaders who participated in a defense forum last month agreed that Taiwan has the capabilities to work with the US, the report said Taiwan’s high-tech defense industry is to enhance collaboration with the US to produce weapons needed for self-defense, the Ministry of National Defense said in a report to the Legislative Yuan. Deputy Minister of National Defense Hsu Yen-pu (徐衍璞) discussed building regional and global industry alliances with US partners at the US-Taiwan Defense Industry Conference in Philadelphia held from Sept. 22 to Tuesday last week, the ministry said in the declassified portion of the report. The visit contributed to maintaining bilateral ties, facilitated Taiwan’s efforts to acquire weapons and equipment, and strengthened the resilience of the two nation’s defense industries, it said. Taiwan-US ties
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering