The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday unveiled its proposal for a referendum on the construction of the nearly complete Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s (新北市) Gongliao District (貢寮), and suggested postponing the vote from August, as originally scheduled, to December to allow for the implementation of absentee voting.
The wording in the proposal would ask the public: “Do you agree that the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant should be halted and that it not become operational?” (你是否同意核四廠停止興建不得運轉)
The proposal will be submitted to the legislature for approval under the name of KMT Legislator Lee Ching-hua (李慶華) and other lawmakers, not the KMT caucus.
Photo: Wu Ming-chung, Taipei Times
Lee needed to collect signatures from at least 19 other lawmakers to meet the threshold required to submit the proposal to the legislature.
The proposal lists five reasons for halting the construction and banning the operation of the power plant, as well as five counterarguments.
The reasons listed against running the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant were: First, operating a nuclear plant is not the safest way to generate energy and carries the risk of causing irreparable consequences.
Photo: CNA
Second, nuclear power is not the cheapest source of energy, considering the cost of disposing of nuclear waste, decommissioning a plant and cleaning up the construction site.
Third, there are many safety issues have been discovered at the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant during its construction, which are compounded by the fact that Taiwan Power Co (Taipower, 台電) is not experienced in integrating components for the plant made by different companies, concerns that the operator has withheld information about safety violations and a general lack of confidence in the government’s regulatory mechanisms.
Fourth, Taiwan is frequently hit by earthquakes and typhoons and the power plant is in a vast metropolitan area. If there was a threat of a radiation leak, the government does not have the capability to evacuate the entire area that would be at risk.
Fifth, after the accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in 2011, Japan temporarily shut down all its nuclear power plants and some other countries starting working toward becoming nuclear-free. Taiwan can also adopt such a policy and develop alternative sources of energy.
The five reasons listed in the proposal in favor of finishing the construction of the power plant and making it operational were:
First, generating nuclear power is a relatively clean process in terms of carbon dioxide emissions and helps cut the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions so it can honor the environmental pledges it has made.
Second, a nuclear-free homeland cannot be achieved in one step. Nuclear power plants are a key element in the nation’s gradual progress toward that goal, as they provide a stable supply of energy that can allow people to change their lifestyles and the government to adjust the industrial structure to set the nation on a path toward becoming nuclear-free and having a near-zero-emission economy.
Third, terminating the construction of the power plant could lead to power shortages because all renewable energy technologies, such as natural gas, are still undeveloped, extremely expensive and vulnerable to fluctuations in the prices of raw materials in the global market.
Fourth, halting the plant’s construction could send prices of electricity soaring, severely impacting the economy and people’s livelihoods, resulting in a decline in GDP, driving industries overseas and raising unemployment.
Fifth, if the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant cannot be put into operation, it might be necessary to extend operating licenses of the nation’s three operational nuclear plants, which could carry serious risks because of the three plants’ aging reactors.
The fourth and fifth reasons are exemplified by Japan, which recorded a trade deficit of ￥2 trillion (US$21.1 billion) in 2011 mainly because of the large amount of natural gas it had to import to meet power shortages caused by having all 54 of its nuclear reactors out of service.
Its trade deficit nearly tripled to a record ￥6.9 trillion last year due to high fuel import costs, forcing Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to revise the zero-nuclear policy decided by the previous administration in response to the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear incident.
The KMT’s proposal came after President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) and KMT party leaders decided late last month to place the issue of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant to a referendum in August to settle the decades-long controversy over its construction.
If the proposal passes the legislature, the Referendum Act (公民投票法) stipulates that the referendum would have to be held no sooner than one month and no later than six months after gaining legislative approval.
KMT legislative caucus whip Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) said that the referendum could be held in December to allow enough time for the inclusion of absentee votes.
Absentee ballots are not currently sanctioned by the legal system and the Ministry of the Interior has said it would need five to six months to prepare the materials needed to carry out absentee voting after related legislation is revised or enacted.
Some KMT lawmakers objected to the proposed question.
KMT Legislator Ting Shou-chung (丁守中) said the part asking if the public agrees that the plant “should not be operated” should be removed because it could preclude the chance of the facility being used for other purposes, for example, gas generation.
Asking if the power plant should not be operated could give the impression that the NT$230 billion (US$7.76 billion) that has already been poured into the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant has been a waste, Ting said.
Ting, a vocal opponent of the power plant, said the proposal also failed to explain in detail the various faults in the design and construction of the power plant that have been identified and which have caused widespread public concern.
KMT Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) expressed similar views, adding that the proposal did not clearly state when the construction should stop.
Ting reiterated his call for the legislature to establish an ad hoc committee composed of lawmakers across party lines to initiate a joint proposal.
Lo said she is also considering putting forward her own version of the proposal.
Responding to Ting’s concerns, Lai said the question of whether the plant should be operated had been added to the proposal to prevent another referendum calling for the project to be abandoned if the referendum to halt construction fails to pass.
The KMT headquarters said it was happy with the party caucus’ referendum question.
KMT spokesman Yin Wei (殷瑋) said the party expects the referendum process to promote rational dialogue between different groups on the issue.
Separately yesterday, Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) suggested that the government should invite international nuclear experts, such as the International Atomic Energy Agency, to evaluate the safety of the power plant and make the results of the evaluation accessible to the public so they can be credibly informed about the issue from an independent source.
“I don’t think that information from Taipower alone is convincing. A safety evaluation from international experts would greatly help people make an informed decision on the matter,” Hau said.
Regarding a proposal made by civic groups that instead of a nationwide vote, it should be residents in New Taipei City, Taipei and Keelung that live close to the plant that make the decision, Hau said that the referendum should be a national one because it was about more than just the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, it was about the views of all Taiwanese on nuclear energy.
Additional reporting by Mo Yan-chih
GEARING UP: An invasion would be difficult and would strain China’s forces, but it has conducted large-scale training supporting an invasion scenario, the report said China increased its military pressure on Taiwan last year and took other steps in preparation for a potential invasion, an annual report published by the US Department of Defense on Wednesday showed. “Throughout 2023, Beijing continued to erode longstanding norms in and around Taiwan by employing a range of pressure tactics against Taiwan,” the report said, which is titled “Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China (PRC) 2024.” The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) “is preparing for a contingency to unify Taiwan with the PRC by force, if perceived as necessary by Beijing, while simultaneously deterring, delaying or denying
‘LAGGING BEHIND’: The NATO secretary-general called on democratic allies to be ‘clear-eyed’ about Beijing’s military buildup, urging them to boost military spending NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte mentioning China’s bullying of Taiwan and its ambition to reshape the global order has significance during a time when authoritarian states are continuously increasing their aggression, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) said yesterday. In a speech at the Carnegie Europe think tank in Brussels on Thursday, Rutte said Beijing is bullying Taiwan and would start to “nibble” at Taiwan if Russia benefits from a post-invasion peace deal with Ukraine. He called on democratic allies to boost defense investments and also urged NATO members to increase defense spending in the face of growing military threats from Russia
PEACEFUL RESOLUTION: A statement issued following a meeting between Australia and Britain reiterated support for Taiwan and opposition to change in the Taiwan Strait Canada should support the peaceful resolution of Taiwan’s destiny according to the will of Taiwanese, Canadian lawmakers said in a resolution marking the second anniversary of that nation’s Indo-Pacific strategy on Monday. The Canadian House of Commons committee on Canada-Chinese relations made the comment as part of 34 recommendations for the new edition of the strategy, adding that Ottawa should back Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations. Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, first published in October 2022, emphasized that the region’s security, trade, human rights, democracy and environmental protection would play a crucial role in shaping Canada’s future. The strategy called for Canada to deepen
TECH CONFERENCE: Input from industry and academic experts can contribute to future policymaking across government agencies, President William Lai said Multifunctional service robots could be the next new area in which Taiwan could play a significant role, given its strengths in chip manufacturing and software design, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) chairman and chief executive C.C. Wei (魏哲家) said yesterday. “In the past two months, our customers shared a lot of their future plans with me. Artificial intelligence [AI] and AI applications were the most talked about subjects in our conversation,” Wei said in a speech at the National Science and Technology Conference in Taipei. TSMC, the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, counts Nvidia Corp, Advanced Micro Devices Inc, Apple Inc and
RSS