The National Communications Commission (NCC) yesterday ruled that Want Want China Times Group (旺旺中時集團) has not met the three conditions it set last year for the group’s acquisition of the cable TV services operated by China Network Systems (CNS, 中嘉網路), adding that another administrative hearing would not be necessary.
For the acquisition to be valid, group chairman Tsai Eng-meng (蔡衍明) and his family members or associates must completely dissociate themselves from CtiTV’s (中天電視) news channel. China Television Co’s (CTV, 中視) digital news channel, which also belongs to the group, must be changed to a non-news channel and CTV must have an independent editorial system.
The commission said that each condition must be met for the Want Want-CNS deal to take effect.
The group filed an application for approval with the commission in December last year after placing 75 percent of the shares in CtiTV owned by the Tsai family in the trust of the Industrial Bank of Taiwan.
NCC Chairperson Howard Shyr (石世豪) said the commission had consulted with the Ministry of Economic Affairs, the agency responsible for enforcing the Trust Act (信託法), which said that placing the property in a third-party trust did not change the controlling relations between the property and the property owner. However, the ministry said such matters must be determined on a case-by-case basis.
“The conditions we set last year said clearly that Tsai and his associates must not ‘directly or indirectly control or hold the shares of CtTiTV,’” Shyr said. “Judging from their application, the group did not meet that condition.”
Andy Hsieh (謝煥乾), director of the commission’s legal department, said the ruling showed the group cannot win approval by placing the shares under the trust of a third party. If the group finds another way to meet the conditions, it can file another application, he said.
In other developments, the commission released a draft broadcasting media monopolization prevention and diversity preservation act (廣播電視壟斷防制與多元維護法), also known as the “media anti-monopolization act.”
The draft act contains 53 articles. Regulations on cross-media ownership state that the commission will ban mergers between print and broadcasting media if such a merger would have an overall influence on public opinion comparable to a television viewership rate of more than 20 percent, because it would create “a substantial danger” leading to a media monopoly.
If a cross-media merger involves news channels or channels airing news programs, the commission would be able to ban the merger if it would create an influence comparable to a TV viewership rate of 15 percent.
The act would also ban mergers among terrestrial TV services or the merger of radio services if one of the parties to the proposed merger reaches 75 percent of the nation’s population. A merger of two radio services would be banned if it would create a listenership rate exceeding 15 percent in a certain area or a national listening rate of more than 10 percent.
Mergers of satellite channels would be banned if they would cause the TV viewership rate to exceed 15 percent. However, if a merger takes place among satellite news channels, the viewership rate threshold would drop to 10 percent.
The draft also states that cable TV operators cannot give differential treatment to different channel operators without a legitimate reason. A merger between two cable TV services would be banned if the TV channels owned or operated by the two operators would jointly create a TV viewership share exceeding 15 percent.
The commission set four more principles guiding future rulings.
The draft proposal would authorize the commission to entrust a professional third party with the task of regularly conducting surveys on the readership, listenership and viewership of newspapers, radio stations and TV channels to help it gauge media outlets’ influence. Media outlets could not refuse a request for such information without a valid reason. Data collected through such surveys would be made public, the commission said.
The proposal said that a media outlet’s influence would also be weighted if it owns more than one channel.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS