Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers yesterday maintained that students have every right to attend meetings of legislative committees and expressed concern over one media outlet’s criticism of students’ behavior toward the education minister on Monday.
The Chinese-language United Daily News yesterday dedicated its front page and another full page to criticism of a group of university students — who, on a visit to a legislative committee meeting, had told Minister of Education Chiang Wei-ling (蔣偉寧) to his face that he was not qualified for the job — and DPP Legislator Cheng Li-chiun (鄭麗君) for turning the committee meeting into a “private courtroom” for the students to “grill” Chiang.
The Ministry of Education sent an e-mail to university authorities after student-led protests last week against a controversial Next Media Group deal. The e-mail asked universities to investigate protesters out of “concern” for their health, prompting accusations of a re-emergence of the tactics of the White Terror era.
Photo: Taipei Times
Cheng, the convener of the legislature’s Education and Culture Committee, invited student representatives and professors who participated in the protests to attend a special session of the committee on Monday.
In response to the United Daily News coverage, Cheng yesterday said the newspaper had infringed on the students’ freedom of expression and had tried to shift the focus away from inappropriate practices at the ministry.
The students’ explanation of the chilling effect of the e-mail was the main reason why Chiang offered an apology and a four-point pledge to correct the ministry’s mistakes and ensure students’ rights to participate in protests at the meeting, Cheng said.
Cheng also expressed disappointment at a U-turn by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers, saying they disagreed with the ministry’s move and supported her decision to call the special session on Monday.
“These students are citizens and adults, and we should treat them accordingly. Citizens have the freedom to express their views on public affairs, and to challenge unfairness and injustice. That is what the student movement is all about,” Cheng said, adding that if anyone oppressed the students’ freedom of expression, they were making the same mistake as the ministry.
The students’ attendance at the meeting was legal, DPP Legislator Yeh Yi-jin (葉宜津) said, noting that Article 67 of the Constitution stipulates that “the legislature may set up various committees and such committees may invite government officials and private persons concerned to be present at their meetings to answer questions.”
The public should appreciate the students’ courage in stepping forward and challenging authority, and the students’ comments certainly did not amount to “contempt of the legislature” as has been claimed, she said.
DPP Legislator Chen Ting-fei (陳亭妃) said the students and professors stood on the same podium as Chiang, who returned to his seat when the students were speaking, and answered legislators’ questions, rather than “grilling” the minister.
Chen Wei-ting (陳為廷), a National Tsing Hua University (NTHU) student who accused Chiang of incompetence, being hypocritical and lying about his support for the student movement, issued a statement on his Facebook page yesterday, saying that while he could have worded his responses better, he stood by the context of his comments and that the United Daily News’ claim that he had been impolite was “outrageous” and incorrect.
NTHU issued a press release yesterday, in which the school said it was disappointed at Chen’s comments and behavior. The school pulled the release from its Facebook page hours later after it was criticized.
Wang Dan (王丹), a Chinese dissident who was part of the student movement during China’s Tiananmen Square Massacre in 1989 and who now teaches at NTHU, offered his support to the student protesters on his Facebook page.
Wang said he was astonished at the newspaper’s two-page coverage and its criticism of the students rather than the ministry’s misconduct.
“I’m wondering why society is so tolerant of authority, yet so critical of young people who participate in public affairs,” he said.
When reached for comment, the United Daily News said its coverage reflected the truth and that it would continue to publish stories in line with professional journalistic practices.
Additional reporting by Chao Ching-yu
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS