Calls by the international community that former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who is serving a prison sentence for corruption, be granted medical parole is a “misunderstanding” of the case, government officials said yesterday.
They said granting Chen parole is not possible, adding that they “cannot allow political or external factors to pressure” them to do so.
The officials made the remarks at an international press conference, called by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) and the Ministry of Justice (MOJ), in response to concerns raised by foreign politicians, international organizations and human rights activists over the treatment Chen has received in prison and which has led to health issues.
Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times
Media reports about Chen’s case were inconsistent with the facts, which resulted in a misunderstanding of the way the government handled the case, MOFA Deputy Minister Tung Kuo-yu (董國猷) said when he explained why the press conference was held.
“We aim to explain that former president Chen was accorded privileges in prison and appropriate healthcare, to clarify that he was not mistreated in Taipei Prison and to prevent the spread of false information, which could lead to political disputes,” Tung said.
Deputy Minister of Justice Chen Shou-huang (陳守煌) read out a statement saying that Chen is serving a prison sentence for a criminal offense and that he is neither a political prisoner nor a prisoner of conscience, that his right to receive medical treatment were fully respected and that Chen does not meet the conditions required for medical parole.
Having served four years of a lengthy prison sentence after being convicted of corruption during his term in office, Chen was admitted to Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TVGH) in September. He was later diagnosed with severe depression, with symptoms of anxiety and somatization disorder. He has been on escorted visits to the hospital since then.
Paragraph 1 of Article 6 of the UN’s Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners states that “there shall be no discrimination on grounds of race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status,” Chen Shou-huang said as he began his remarks.
“However, being a former president, Chen Shui-bian has been provided the best living conditions and healthcare to the extent permissible by law and by the prison’s current facilities,” he said.
Chen Shui-bian “obviously enjoys special privileges,” Chen Shou-huang said, citing several examples of the different treatments given to the former president and other prisoners, both in Taipei Prison and in hospital.
The former president has been able to receive effective, comprehensive treatment, even while under escort at a hospital, and so Taipei Prison believes that he, given his current state of health, does not meet the conditions for medical parole, Chen Shou-huang said.
He added that a few international organizations and individuals called for the former president’s medical parole because they were “unaware” of the situation.
Under the country’s law, ailing inmates can seek medical parole only if they are unable to receive appropriate treatment at their prison, on escorted visits to a hospital or at a medical prison, which was not the case for the former president, Chen Shou-huang said.
Taipei Prison must abide by the law and cannot allow political or external factors to pressure it to illegally grant Chen Shui-bian medical parole, he said.
“Otherwise, the prison would be subject to even more severe criticism by the public and the international community,” he said.
“We hope that people at home and abroad will not give credence to one-sided representations and thereby fail to credit the long-term efforts Taiwan has made to ensure the human rights of inmates, thereby tarnishing Taiwan’s human rights record in the eyes of the international community,” Chen Shou-huang said.
The press conference, held at the Foreign Affairs Ministry building, was also attended by National Taiwan University Hospital physician Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) and two other physicians, Kuo Cheng-deng (郭正典) and Chang Yeh-sen (張葉森), who were at one point prevented from sitting in on the event.
The trio, who joined TVGH’s medical team caring for Chen Shui-bian at his request, presented the press with the views on the former president’s neurological condition offered by Chen Shun-sheng (陳順勝), an emeritus professor of neurology at Chang-Gung University, who was also a member of the team and did not totally agree with the team’s diagnosis.
Chen Shun-sheng said the diagnostic report delivered by the TVGH and Taipei Prison on Oct. 17 tried to “marginalize or dismiss the severity of his [Chen Shui-bian’s] conditions, ignore differences between the neurological diagnoses from different sides … and ignore the critical thinking of cause and effect to determine the true cause of the symptoms.”
The consensus reached by TVGH’s medical team of nine experts excluded some serious neurological conditions because either their causes have not yet been clarified or the panel failed to reach a consensus, Chen Shun-sheng said.
AIR SUPPORT: The Ministry of National Defense thanked the US for the delivery, adding that it was an indicator of the White House’s commitment to the Taiwan Relations Act Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) and Representative to the US Alexander Yui on Friday attended a delivery ceremony for the first of Taiwan’s long-awaited 66 F-16C/D Block 70 jets at a Lockheed Martin Corp factory in Greenville, South Carolina. “We are so proud to be the global home of the F-16 and to support Taiwan’s air defense capabilities,” US Representative William Timmons wrote on X, alongside a photograph of Taiwanese and US officials at the event. The F-16C/D Block 70 jets Taiwan ordered have the same capabilities as aircraft that had been upgraded to F-16Vs. The batch of Lockheed Martin
GRIDLOCK: The National Fire Agency’s Special Search and Rescue team is on standby to travel to the countries to help out with the rescue effort A powerful earthquake rocked Myanmar and neighboring Thailand yesterday, killing at least three people in Bangkok and burying dozens when a high-rise building under construction collapsed. Footage shared on social media from Myanmar’s second-largest city showed widespread destruction, raising fears that many were trapped under the rubble or killed. The magnitude 7.7 earthquake, with an epicenter near Mandalay in Myanmar, struck at midday and was followed by a strong magnitude 6.4 aftershock. The extent of death, injury and destruction — especially in Myanmar, which is embroiled in a civil war and where information is tightly controlled at the best of times —
Taiwan was ranked the fourth-safest country in the world with a score of 82.9, trailing only Andorra, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar in Numbeo’s Safety Index by Country report. Taiwan’s score improved by 0.1 points compared with last year’s mid-year report, which had Taiwan fourth with a score of 82.8. However, both scores were lower than in last year’s first review, when Taiwan scored 83.3, and are a long way from when Taiwan was named the second-safest country in the world in 2021, scoring 84.8. Taiwan ranked higher than Singapore in ninth with a score of 77.4 and Japan in 10th with
SECURITY RISK: If there is a conflict between China and Taiwan, ‘there would likely be significant consequences to global economic and security interests,’ it said China remains the top military and cyber threat to the US and continues to make progress on capabilities to seize Taiwan, a report by US intelligence agencies said on Tuesday. The report provides an overview of the “collective insights” of top US intelligence agencies about the security threats to the US posed by foreign nations and criminal organizations. In its Annual Threat Assessment, the agencies divided threats facing the US into two broad categories, “nonstate transnational criminals and terrorists” and “major state actors,” with China, Russia, Iran and North Korea named. Of those countries, “China presents the most comprehensive and robust military threat