The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is expected to again propose a vote of no confidence against the “malfunctioning” Cabinet in the legislative session that begins tomorrow.
DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) has endorsed the proposal and is to attend the caucus meeting this morning for discussion with the 40-member strong caucus about the party’s position and strategy.
The DPP proposed a no-confidence motion against the Cabinet led by Premier Sean Chen (陳冲) in the three-day extra legislative session in late July, but the motion was rejected by Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平).
“The Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration has been clueless about how to revive the stagnant economy and improve people’s livelihoods. We seriously recommend that Ma reshuffle the Cabinet,” Su said on a visit to Pingtung County.
Su compared performance of the Cabinet to a “computer crash” and said it was time to “reboot.”
The chairman is expected to meet the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers, who control 64 of the 113 seats in the legislature, in a caucus meeting today and ask them to “make the right decision for the country.”
The Act Governing the Exercise of the Rights of the Legislative Yuan (立法院職權行使法) stipulates that the legislature may propose a no-confidence vote against the premier after collecting the signatures of more than one-third of the total number of legislators. The motion requires at least half the lawmakers to vote in its favor to pass.
DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) said the proposal was legitimate, as the country has ground to a halt and the DPP “does not object for the sake of objection.”
“The ball is now in the KMT’s court,” said Tsai Chi-chang (蔡其昌), chief secretary of the DPP’s caucus.
The DPP said it would focus on the amendments of the Political Party Act (政黨法), the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), the Public Debt Act (公共債務法) and the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法), among others.
The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) is likely to make its first pitch on the scheduled second stage of the electricity price increase once the session begins by demanding a price freeze.
The party would boycott the premier’s scheduled report to the legislature — by occupying the podium if necessary — if the government failed to meet the demand, TSU caucus whip Huang Wen-ling (黃文玲) said.
It would then concentrate on monitoring the administration’s China policy and demand the KMT return all its “ill-gotten assets” in the new session, she added.
The TSU, with only three lawmakers in the legislature, would also be aiming at a long-term goal of recalling Ma after a resolution was reached at the party national congress on Saturday.
TSU Chairman Huang Kun-huei (黃昆輝) said the TSU planned to establish petition stations across the country to collect signatures in a bid to recall Ma after the president finishes the first year of his four-year second term in May next year.
The Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act (總統副總統選舉罷免法) stipulates that a president or vice president who has not served for one year may not be recalled.
KMT lawmakers blocked the opposition’s proposal to recall Ma in May — five days before the end of Ma’s first term.
KMT caucus whip Lin Hong-chih (林鴻池) said it respected the opposition party’s rights to propose a no-confidence motion and urged the Cabinet to present efficient measures to improve the economy.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS