President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said yesterday he regrets and feels sorry about allegations of former Executive Yuan secretary-general Lin Yi-shih’s (林益世) involvement in corruption.
“I feel very regretful and apologetic for Lin being implicated in a judicial case,” Ma said on the sidelines of the opening ceremony of Academia Sinica’s annual conference, the top research institute in Taiwan.
Lin, who resigned from his post on Friday, was questioned by prosecutors on Sunday for his alleged role in a bribery case and, according to his lawyer Lai Su-ju (賴素如), Lin confessed his wrongdoings during a 12-hour questioning session that ended early yesterday.
Photo: Liu Hsin-de, Taipei Times
Ma said it was extremely regrettable that a member of his administration has been involved in such a case.
Noting that integrity and incorruptibility constitute the core values and basic moral standard for civil servants, Ma said any official who violates this principle and commits a crime should be dealt with according to the law.
“There is neither a ‘gray area’ nor room for anyone to dodge this rule,” Ma said, adding that his administrative team would learn a lesson from this incident and would become even more cautious and prudent in recruiting personnel.
Ma said his administration would continue to be resolute in fighting against graft and preventing official corruption.
“We will continue our quest for an incorruptible civil service and clean politics,” the president said.
Lin was accused of accepting a bribe of NT$63 million (US$2.15 million) from Chen Chi-hsiang (陳啟祥), the owner of Kaohsiung-based Ti Yung Co (地勇選礦公司), to help the company secure a slag treatment contract.
The contract was offered by China Steel Corp (中鋼) two years ago when Lin was a legislator.
The 44-year-old Lin was also accused of soliciting another bribe of NT$83 million from Chen between February and March this year. When the owner refused to pay up, Lin allegedly pressured China Steel, a listed company in which the government has a controlling stake, to stop supplying slag to Ti Yung for treatment.
Separately yesterday, Premier Sean Chen (陳冲) apologized to the public for the graft case involving Lin.
“I feel deep regret [over Lin’s case],” the premier told a news conference held at the Executive Yuan.
After the case was exposed, he said, the Cabinet launched an internal investigation and offered information to the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office Special Investigation Division. The Cabinet will also work with prosecutors to provide any further information they may need, he added.
The premier reiterated the importance of the integrity of government officials, saying he has asked the government’s anti-corruption agency to strengthen its work to prevent and combat corruption.
Earlier in the day, Lin issued a statement in which he apologized for his misbehavior, saying he deeply regretted his dereliction of duty and getting involved in corruption.
“I would like to apologize to my family members and my supervisors and the public,” Lin said in the statement, adding that he would like to return all illegal money to the nation and devote himself community services.
Prior to his confession, Lin had denied taking bribes from Chen Chi-hsiang or pressurizing anyone into paying bribes.
He filed a lawsuit against the company owner for aggravated libel.
Additional reporting by Rich Chang
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say