Following a day of clashes between protesters and police, Minister of the Interior Lee Hong-yuan (李鴻源) yesterday said there were “elements of injustice” involved in the dispute over the city’s urban renewal project.
The project in Taipei’s Shilin District (士林), under which a construction firm plans to turn an old residential complex for 38 households into a 15-story high-rise apartment complex, was stalled for three years because of opposition from a family surnamed Wang (王), who had lived in the area for decades. The Wangs were evicted on Wednesday and their two stand-alone homes demolished.
“There were some elements of injustice involved in the urban renewal project, and some rethinking of the urban renewal mechanism may be needed,” Lee said. “I’m worried that what happened to the Wangs may become an obstacle to urban renewal, and that would not be a good thing for the country.”
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
Lee made the remarks during a meeting at the legislature’s Internal Administration Committee meeting, as he and Construction and Planning Agency Director-General Yeh Shi-wen (葉世文) were bombarded by questions by lawmakers across party lines who were upset over the eviction of the Wangs and the large number of police sent by the Taipei City Government.
The Wangs were the only family left who had refused to take part in the urban renewal project. However, the Urban Renewal Act (都市更新條例) stipulates that, as long as the construction firm has obtained the consent of 75 percent of the land owners on a project site, it can ask the government to demolish the rest of the buildings by force.
On Wednesday, a demolition squad escorted by more than 1,000 police officers arrived at the site. More than 300 protesters who came out in support of the Wangs were removed by force, and the Wangs’ homes were demolished.
“The Wangs never said yes to the project, but the city government took their non-response as a yes,” Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Tuan Yi-kang (段宜康) told Lee and Yeh. “How is this consent legitimate if the stakeholder never said ‘yes’ to it?”
Tuan asked why the agency did not try to intervene, since it has said the alleys around the project site might not be wide enough and could pose a fire hazard, or propose that the project be carried out without including the Wangs’ property.
“We did suggest that the Wangs’ property be excluded following a negotiation meeting in February, but the city government said it could not make changes since the project has already been approved,” Yeh said. “As for the fire hazard issue, the city government said it would take care of it and that it wouldn’t be a problem.”
Yeh said no actual on-site inspections had been conducted; instead, everything was done via written documents, since it is the local government that has the final say in the project.
“I wouldn’t say the city government has violated the law, but I believe it could have been done more cautiously,” Yeh said.
Several other DPP lawmakers, as well as Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇) and Chi Kuo-tung (紀國棟) also expressed doubts about the urban renewal mechanism.
National Police Agency Director-General Wang Cho-chiun (王卓鈞) apologized for the actions of some police officers, who allegedly tried to block the media from filming by shining their flashlights at their cameras.
“It’s certainly an inappropriate act, because the media should enjoy full freedom in covering the news,” Wang said. “I’ve asked all police agencies to prohibit such acts.”
At another setting, Premier Sean Chen (陳冲) declined to comment on the case, saying he was not familiar with the eviction and demolition process from start to finish, and so he did not have a full understanding of the case.
He said he favored a thorough review of the Urban Renewal Act and the Administrative Procedure Act (行政程序法) to address biases in the rules and adapt to changes in the legal environment.
Some biases in the urban renewal legal system may have emerged because the act, enacted in 1998, has undergone at least eight revisions, Chen said.
It also contains language that ordinary people might find difficult to understand, resulting in the problem of “asymmetry of knowledge” between ordinary citizens and developers, Chen said.
Saying the Urban Renewal Act was unconstitutional because it failed to uphold equality and people’s right to own property, DPP lawmakers said they would ask for a constitutional interpretation
DPP legislators Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁), Cheng Li-chiun (鄭麗君) and Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) said they would also propose that the act be amended.
Wednesday’s forceful demolition of the Wangs’ homes and the way the police treated protesters also prompted criticism from netizens.
“This is one big step backward for democracy,” a Facebook user named Marco Wang said.
“Democracy no longer exists in this country, the people’s only weapon is their bodies,” another Facebook user said.
A photo in which Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) was dubbed “All Mighty King of House Destruction” was posted by many netizens on social networking sites, including Facebook and Plurk.
Additional reporting by Shih Hsiu-chuan and Chris Wang
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS