A decision by the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to allow Chinese investment in Taiwan’s public infrastructure might be tantamount to inviting foxes into the chicken coop, sources said.
The China International Contractors Association (中國對外承包工程商會), a corporation with close ties to the Chinese government, took a more active stance on joining the International Federation of Asian and West Pacific Contractors Associations (IFAWPCA) last year, when it sent a memo to the group’s secretariat and the Taiwan General Contractors Association (台灣區綜合營造工程工業同業公會) — the Taiwanese representative to the IFAWPCA — saying that China would not join the organization unless the “Taiwan issue” was resolved.
The international association promotes relationships between governments and contractors in the region on civil and building construction projects. As a founding member, Taiwan has been an active participant in the organization.
In the memo, China listed as a prerequisite before it applied for membership that, in any activity and meetings of the international association, there be no presence of the “so-called ROC [Republic of China] national flag, national emblem or national anthem.”
It also said that Taiwanese officials could not attend in any capacity.
The Chinese association also demanded that the international group remove the Taiwanese association from all lists of nations in all meetings, events, documents, Web sites and paperwork to avoid creating the impression that there are “two Chinas,” or one Taiwan and one China.
The memo also demanded that all references to the “Republic of China” be removed from the international group’s Web site and requested that the members take a definitive stance on the demands.
The members would have to sign and approve the memo with the secretariat before China would apply for membership, the memo said, adding that the international association must strictly hold to the demands by negotiating with China to “ask for permission” on any events related to Taiwan thereafter.
In a reply to the Chinese in August last year, the international group’s secretariat said that as an international non-governmental organization, the IFAWPCA was not a political organization, adding that although each member represented their country, they called themselves by their association name and not their national name, which highlights the group’s reluctance to involve itself in political matters.
Sources said that when the memo was received last year, the Taiwanese group asked the Ma administration to intervene, but were told that because elections were coming, the administration tried to delay the issue by calling on Beijing to push back its application.
Though China has yet to apply for membership, after the Ma administration announced that public infrastructure construction would be opened to Chinese investment, Chinese influence in Taiwan’s economy and politics would increase, the sources said.
At that time, the international association would inevitably be forced to agree to China’s strict demands, the sources said.
The sources said that the public sector is worried that further opening up of infrastructure construction to Chinese investors would enable China to control local factions through construction benefits and the contracting of subcontractors, and that such control would be able to influence elections.
Under China’s modus operandi, Chinese investing in public infrastructure projects would be handled and controlled by the Chinese association, the sources said.
In response, Taiwan General Contractors Association chairman Chen Huang-ming (陳煌銘) denied the existence of the Chinese memo and said other member countries were very cordial toward Taiwan.
However, when reporters said there were documents proving that China had submitted a memo stating its preconditions for joining the organization, Chen said he was “not clear” on the matter.
Translated by Jake Chung, Staff Writer
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or