China should refrain from political overtones when promoting cross-strait cooperation on Pingtan Island because more than 80 percent of Taiwanese reject China’s “one country, two systems” formula, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday.
The formula governed the return of former British colony Hong Kong to Chinese rule after 1997, in which the territory was allowed to keep its capitalist economy and British common law traditions for 50 years, while Beijing controls all foreign and defense policy.
Stopping short of saying that the government discourages investment in the Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental Zone, located on Pingtan Island in China’s Fujian Province, the council reminded Taiwanese that it is not a “co-pilot” project sponsored by the Taiwanese government.
The council issued the statement yesterday ahead of the departure today by a delegation of government officials, to be led by Straits Exchange Foundation Vice Chairman Kao Koong-lian (高孔廉), for a seven-day visit to southeastern China, including a tour of the zone.
Developed by China’s Fujian Provincial Government to become a pilot area for cross-strait cooperation, the Pingtan project is the centerpiece of Beijing’s West-Taiwan Strait Economic Zone plan, which has won the backing of China’s State Council.
Fujian Governor Su Shulin (蘇樹林) said on Wednesday that Pingtan is expected to receive more than 260 billion yuan (US$41 billion) in Chinese government subsidies over the next five years for infrastructure development.
China has put too much of a political overtone into the Pingtan project, which in fact was designed in accordance with its “12th five-year plan” that handles cross-strait relationships under the principle of the “one country, two systems” formula, council spokesman Liu Te-shun (劉德勳) said yesterday.
It has been proven by survey results over a long period that Taiwanese oppose the “one country, two systems” formula, he said.
While the Chinese have been promoting Pingtan as a cross-strait “co-pilot” project with five aspects — joint planning, joint development, cooperation, joint management and joint benefits — those were “not the facts,” Liu said.
The development of Pingtan would get better results if China focused on economic aspects and “removed unnecessary political factors,” he added.
Taiwanese-based engineering consultants have participated in the design of the project and some Taiwanese have been recruited, but that did not mean that it is the Taiwanese government’s policy to cooperate with China on the project, Liu said.
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Kao Charng (高長) said that the major difference between the Pingtan project and other special economic areas in China was that China has “made blatant moves” to promote the project and it has “expedient political purposes.”
“It’s fine, [China] can do whatever it likes, but we can’t let it mislead people in Taiwan that it [the project] has the consent of our government,” Kao said.
The council said it was not discouraging people from investing in Pingtan Island.
“We simply want people to have a better understanding about the project and make a thorough risk assessment,” Liu said.
Meanwhile, the Central News Agency yesterday quoted an unnamed Ministry of Economic Affairs official as saying that the Investment Commission would review applications for planned investment in Pingtan by Taiwanese businesses on a case-by-case basis.
The official said the reviews would take into account the potential impact of the investment in Pingtan on Taiwan in terms of economic and non-economic factors. If necessary, the ministry would consult with the relevant government agencies before reaching its final conclusion, the official added.
Additional reporting by staff writer
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS