The Environment and Animal Society of Taiwan (EAST) yesterday said it suspected that the Council of Agriculture had concealed cases of avian influenza for more than two years and had lied to the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) in its reports.
The group said former premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) and former Council of Agriculture minister Chen Wu-hsiung (陳武雄) should be held responsible for the cover up.
EAST disclosed two documents from 2010, dated March 1 and March 8, that the council’s Animal Health Research Institute sent to the Bureau of Animal and Plant Health Inspection and Quarantine. The documents showed that two technical group meetings held on Feb. 25 and March 5 that year had already received H5N2 Intravenous Pathogenicity Index [IVPI] lab results, which showed readings above 1.2 and 2.41, indicators that the strains were highly pathogenic.
Readings greater than 1.2 in an IVPI test on a six-week-old chicken indicate a highly pathogenic strain.
However, the council’s four reports to the OIE that year all said that the cases were “of a low pathogenic level,” EAST executive director Wu Hung (朱增宏) said, adding that the council should explain why it added “clinical high death rate” as a criteria for determining a virus strain’s severity.
The association received a report from an undisclosed source in early 2010 that said an outbreak of highly pathogenic H5N2 avian influenza had occurred and that the council was trying to cover up the fact, Wu Hung said, adding that to confirm the report, the association had asked the bureau to provide any related documents, but the bureau refused, saying they were “official confidential information.”
Wu Hung said the association had filed a lawsuit with the Administrative Court against the bureau for violating the Freedom of Government Information Act (政府資訊公開法), but it was rejected. It is now in the process of being appealed at the Taipei High Administrative Court.
Chen Yen-chun (陳彥君), a lawyer from Primordial Law Firm, which was commissioned by the association to pursue the case, said the bureau must provide other legal sources to explain why the documents were classified “confidential, official use only.”
Furthermore, the bureau’s response — “check foreign official Web sites on the Internet by yourself” — was not an adequate government attitude, because it is the government’s duty to answer public inquiries, Chen Yen-chun said.
EAST director Chen Yu-min (陳玉敏) said when facing outbreaks of bird flu in Southeast Asia in March 2006, the National Security Council had formulated a policy prohibiting all slaughter of poultry in traditional markets and funds were made available for several government agencies to enforce the policy.
“However, right before the official enactment day on April 1, 2010, the council released a proclamation saying that because the conditions of avian influenza had stabilized and in consideration of the public’s eating habits, selling and slaughtering live poultry in traditional markets would be allowed,” Chen Yu-min said.
The outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza was occurring in Taiwan at that time, so how could the council make such a risky decision, Chen Yu-min asked.
The group said the council had concealed the truth from the OIE, the media and the public for two years, not just for 70 days since the outbreak in Changhua County in December last year.
They urged the Control Yuan to find out who should be held responsible for the decision to cover-up the outbreak.
At a separate setting, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) also blamed Chen Wu-hsiung for the controversy.
Under Chen Wu-hsiung’s leadership, the council betrayed its professionalism and filed a false report on the outbreak, DPP spokesperson Lin Yu-chang (林右昌) said.
The council’s report was first submitted to the OIE on Jan. 10, four days before the presidential election, the OIE Web site shows.
In a follow-up report on Saturday, the council still listed the outbreak as having a low pathogenic level.
The government’s handling of the case is a major mistake, Lin said, adding that the latest outbreak of H5N2 influenza could be blamed on the inaction and incompetence of the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
Facing a similar crisis when it was in office, the DPP -administration adopted a standard operating procedure in handling avian influenza outbreaks — culling poultry, sterilizing poultry farms, taking control of contaminated farms and making public announcements on the spread of the disease, Lin said.
“There was no severe outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza during the DPP administration, and it was not because we were lucky, but because we always took the matter seriously,” he said.
At a press conference yesterday, Chen Wu-hsiung denied any wrongdoing during his term and said: “I have nothing to apologize for.”
The former minister, who stepped down last month said the report by Kevin H. J. Lee (李惠仁), a freelance journalist who spent more than six years investigating avian influenza in Taiwan and first reported on its spread in his documentary titled A Secret That Can’t Be Exposed (不能戳的秘密), only presented “partial facts” on the matter.
He said he would be willing to discuss the matter with Lee or anyone in an open debate.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or