The Environment and Animal Society of Taiwan (EAST) yesterday said it suspected that the Council of Agriculture had concealed cases of avian influenza for more than two years and had lied to the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) in its reports.
The group said former premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) and former Council of Agriculture minister Chen Wu-hsiung (陳武雄) should be held responsible for the cover up.
EAST disclosed two documents from 2010, dated March 1 and March 8, that the council’s Animal Health Research Institute sent to the Bureau of Animal and Plant Health Inspection and Quarantine. The documents showed that two technical group meetings held on Feb. 25 and March 5 that year had already received H5N2 Intravenous Pathogenicity Index [IVPI] lab results, which showed readings above 1.2 and 2.41, indicators that the strains were highly pathogenic.
Readings greater than 1.2 in an IVPI test on a six-week-old chicken indicate a highly pathogenic strain.
However, the council’s four reports to the OIE that year all said that the cases were “of a low pathogenic level,” EAST executive director Wu Hung (朱增宏) said, adding that the council should explain why it added “clinical high death rate” as a criteria for determining a virus strain’s severity.
The association received a report from an undisclosed source in early 2010 that said an outbreak of highly pathogenic H5N2 avian influenza had occurred and that the council was trying to cover up the fact, Wu Hung said, adding that to confirm the report, the association had asked the bureau to provide any related documents, but the bureau refused, saying they were “official confidential information.”
Wu Hung said the association had filed a lawsuit with the Administrative Court against the bureau for violating the Freedom of Government Information Act (政府資訊公開法), but it was rejected. It is now in the process of being appealed at the Taipei High Administrative Court.
Chen Yen-chun (陳彥君), a lawyer from Primordial Law Firm, which was commissioned by the association to pursue the case, said the bureau must provide other legal sources to explain why the documents were classified “confidential, official use only.”
Furthermore, the bureau’s response — “check foreign official Web sites on the Internet by yourself” — was not an adequate government attitude, because it is the government’s duty to answer public inquiries, Chen Yen-chun said.
EAST director Chen Yu-min (陳玉敏) said when facing outbreaks of bird flu in Southeast Asia in March 2006, the National Security Council had formulated a policy prohibiting all slaughter of poultry in traditional markets and funds were made available for several government agencies to enforce the policy.
“However, right before the official enactment day on April 1, 2010, the council released a proclamation saying that because the conditions of avian influenza had stabilized and in consideration of the public’s eating habits, selling and slaughtering live poultry in traditional markets would be allowed,” Chen Yu-min said.
The outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza was occurring in Taiwan at that time, so how could the council make such a risky decision, Chen Yu-min asked.
The group said the council had concealed the truth from the OIE, the media and the public for two years, not just for 70 days since the outbreak in Changhua County in December last year.
They urged the Control Yuan to find out who should be held responsible for the decision to cover-up the outbreak.
At a separate setting, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) also blamed Chen Wu-hsiung for the controversy.
Under Chen Wu-hsiung’s leadership, the council betrayed its professionalism and filed a false report on the outbreak, DPP spokesperson Lin Yu-chang (林右昌) said.
The council’s report was first submitted to the OIE on Jan. 10, four days before the presidential election, the OIE Web site shows.
In a follow-up report on Saturday, the council still listed the outbreak as having a low pathogenic level.
The government’s handling of the case is a major mistake, Lin said, adding that the latest outbreak of H5N2 influenza could be blamed on the inaction and incompetence of the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
Facing a similar crisis when it was in office, the DPP -administration adopted a standard operating procedure in handling avian influenza outbreaks — culling poultry, sterilizing poultry farms, taking control of contaminated farms and making public announcements on the spread of the disease, Lin said.
“There was no severe outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza during the DPP administration, and it was not because we were lucky, but because we always took the matter seriously,” he said.
At a press conference yesterday, Chen Wu-hsiung denied any wrongdoing during his term and said: “I have nothing to apologize for.”
The former minister, who stepped down last month said the report by Kevin H. J. Lee (李惠仁), a freelance journalist who spent more than six years investigating avian influenza in Taiwan and first reported on its spread in his documentary titled A Secret That Can’t Be Exposed (不能戳的秘密), only presented “partial facts” on the matter.
He said he would be willing to discuss the matter with Lee or anyone in an open debate.
AIR SUPPORT: The Ministry of National Defense thanked the US for the delivery, adding that it was an indicator of the White House’s commitment to the Taiwan Relations Act Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) and Representative to the US Alexander Yui on Friday attended a delivery ceremony for the first of Taiwan’s long-awaited 66 F-16C/D Block 70 jets at a Lockheed Martin Corp factory in Greenville, South Carolina. “We are so proud to be the global home of the F-16 and to support Taiwan’s air defense capabilities,” US Representative William Timmons wrote on X, alongside a photograph of Taiwanese and US officials at the event. The F-16C/D Block 70 jets Taiwan ordered have the same capabilities as aircraft that had been upgraded to F-16Vs. The batch of Lockheed Martin
GRIDLOCK: The National Fire Agency’s Special Search and Rescue team is on standby to travel to the countries to help out with the rescue effort A powerful earthquake rocked Myanmar and neighboring Thailand yesterday, killing at least three people in Bangkok and burying dozens when a high-rise building under construction collapsed. Footage shared on social media from Myanmar’s second-largest city showed widespread destruction, raising fears that many were trapped under the rubble or killed. The magnitude 7.7 earthquake, with an epicenter near Mandalay in Myanmar, struck at midday and was followed by a strong magnitude 6.4 aftershock. The extent of death, injury and destruction — especially in Myanmar, which is embroiled in a civil war and where information is tightly controlled at the best of times —
Taiwan was ranked the fourth-safest country in the world with a score of 82.9, trailing only Andorra, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar in Numbeo’s Safety Index by Country report. Taiwan’s score improved by 0.1 points compared with last year’s mid-year report, which had Taiwan fourth with a score of 82.8. However, both scores were lower than in last year’s first review, when Taiwan scored 83.3, and are a long way from when Taiwan was named the second-safest country in the world in 2021, scoring 84.8. Taiwan ranked higher than Singapore in ninth with a score of 77.4 and Japan in 10th with
SECURITY RISK: If there is a conflict between China and Taiwan, ‘there would likely be significant consequences to global economic and security interests,’ it said China remains the top military and cyber threat to the US and continues to make progress on capabilities to seize Taiwan, a report by US intelligence agencies said on Tuesday. The report provides an overview of the “collective insights” of top US intelligence agencies about the security threats to the US posed by foreign nations and criminal organizations. In its Annual Threat Assessment, the agencies divided threats facing the US into two broad categories, “nonstate transnational criminals and terrorists” and “major state actors,” with China, Russia, Iran and North Korea named. Of those countries, “China presents the most comprehensive and robust military threat