Debate within the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) about the so-called “1992 consensus” began right after DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) loss in the presidential election and has continued throughout the Lunar New Year break, as the party tries to determine if it should fine-tune its China policy to appeal to voters, DPP politicians and analysts said.
The “1992 consensus” was seen as one of the crucial factors in the Jan. 14 presidential election, which gave President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) a second four-year term.
The “1992 consensus” is only a part of cross-strait relations and it did not directly contribute to the DPP’s loss in the election, former DPP legislator Lin Cho-shui (林濁水) said.
The DPP should not accept the fictional consensus simply because of the loss, because that would only lend legitimacy to the KMT stance on the matter, Lin said.
However, the party does need to reconsider its position on the “1992 consensus” after weighing gains and losses in the three areas of sovereignty, security and trade, Lin said.
As for the “Taiwan Consensus,” an initiative proposed by Tsai, Lin said that it stressed the democratic nature of the process, but was less detailed in its content, which was the voters’ main concern about it.
“Tsai could easily have said that the content of the ‘Taiwan consensus’ means ‘The Republic of China [ROC] is Taiwan and Taiwan is the ROC’ — one of her major statements in the campaign. I have no idea why she did not make the connection,” he said.
Former DPP legislator Kuo Cheng-liang (郭正亮) was among those who said the DPP should accept the “1992 consensus” to at least some extent or find ways to work around the consensus, since the DPP has yet to propose any solution for engaging China without the “1992 consensus.”
The DPP must change its stance on cross-strait affairs because both China and the US favor the KMT’s approach, as shown by their preference for Ma in the presidential election, Kuo said.
Kuo said the DPP should review its policy on Taiwanese independence, its tolerance for the “one China with different interpretations” framework and whether to replace a “Taiwan consensus” with a “constitutional consensus.”
The party could also interpret the “1992 consensus” as “a platform to set aside disputes, without any timetable” to foster possible dialogue with Beijing, he said.
Former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) also labeled the “Taiwan consensus” as “weak and vague,” saying that the DPP’s “1999 Resolution on Taiwan’s Future,” which defines Taiwan as a sovereign country separate from China, while acknowledging the ROC as the country’s formal title, would be better for explaining the party’s China policy.
Regardless of what the DPP’s plan to deal with the “1992 consensus” is, the election should not be interpreted as “a victory and Taiwanese people’s endorsement of the consensus,” Soochow University professor Lo Chih-cheng (羅致政) said.
The “1992 consensus” is too weak to sustain bilateral engagement over the next four years and Beijing could step up its pressure for political negotiations, Lo said.
Tsai has not made any comments on the matter since the election. She has pledged to submit a complete review of the election campaign to the party before March 1, when her resignation as party chair takes effect.
Nvidia Corp yesterday unveiled its new high-speed interconnect technology, NVLink Fusion, with Taiwanese application-specific IC (ASIC) designers Alchip Technologies Ltd (世芯) and MediaTek Inc (聯發科) among the first to adopt the technology to help build semi-custom artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure for hyperscalers. Nvidia has opened its technology to outside users, as hyperscalers and cloud service providers are building their own cost-effective AI chips, or accelerators, used in AI servers by leveraging ASIC firms’ designing capabilities to reduce their dependence on Nvidia. Previously, NVLink technology was only available for Nvidia’s own AI platform. “NVLink Fusion opens Nvidia’s AI platform and rich ecosystem for
‘WORLD’S LOSS’: Taiwan’s exclusion robs the world of the benefits it could get from one of the foremost practitioners of disease prevention and public health, Minister Chiu said Taiwan should be allowed to join the World Health Assembly (WHA) as an irreplaceable contributor to global health and disease prevention efforts, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said yesterday. He made the comment at a news conference in Taipei, hours before a Taiwanese delegation was to depart for Geneva, Switzerland, seeking to meet with foreign representatives for a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the WHA, the WHO’s annual decisionmaking meeting, which would be held from Monday next week to May 27. As of yesterday, Taiwan had yet to receive an invitation. Taiwan has much to offer to the international community’s
CAUSE AND EFFECT: China’s policies prompted the US to increase its presence in the Indo-Pacific, and Beijing should consider if this outcome is in its best interests, Lai said China has been escalating its military and political pressure on Taiwan for many years, but should reflect on this strategy and think about what is really in its best interest, President William Lai (賴清德) said. Lai made the remark in a YouTube interview with Mindi World News that was broadcast on Saturday, ahead of the first anniversary of his presidential inauguration tomorrow. The US has clearly stated that China is its biggest challenge and threat, with US President Donald Trump and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth repeatedly saying that the US should increase its forces in the Indo-Pacific region
ALL TOGETHER: Only by including Taiwan can the WHA fully exemplify its commitment to ‘One World for Health,’ the representative offices of eight nations in Taiwan said The representative offices in Taiwan of eight nations yesterday issued a joint statement reiterating their support for Taiwan’s meaningful engagement with the WHO and for Taipei’s participation as an observer at the World Health Assembly (WHA). The joint statement came as Taiwan has not received an invitation to this year’s WHA, which started yesterday and runs until Tuesday next week. This year’s meeting of the decisionmaking body of the WHO in Geneva, Switzerland, would be the ninth consecutive year Taiwan has been excluded. The eight offices, which reaffirmed their support for Taiwan, are the British Office Taipei, the Australian Office Taipei, the