President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) would be wrong if he interpreted his re-election as a complete victory for his policies, because the development of Taiwan’s democracy appeared to be backsliding, a coalition of democracy advocates said yesterday.
While Saturday’s presidential and legislative elections ended peacefully, violations of core democratic values, including interference by business tycoons and foreign countries, posed great concerns to Taiwan’s democracy, said Hsu Wei-chun (徐偉群), an assistant professor at Chung Yuan Christian University.
Hsu was among the academics in a press conference organized by the Association of Taiwan Democracy to voice their concerns on the sidelines of the coalition’s annual plenary session.
That interference, and the Ma administration’s numerous violations of basic democratic values, such as its suppression of freedom of speech and protesters, evading of legislative monitoring and violation of administrative neutrality, have jeopardized Taiwan’s democratic system, he said.
“Ma’s re-election victory would not legitimize those facts completely nor represent a public mandate because some basic democratic principles, such as the politics of responsibility and administrative neutrality, should not be broken,” he said.
Democracy should ensure that the public has the right to vote of their free will, but the just-concluded elections have failed to protect Taiwanese from fear and incitement, said Liu Ching-yi (劉靜怡), a professor at National Taiwan University.
Liu proposed the establishment of a legal system to safeguard Taiwan from threats and intimidation from foreign and corporate influences, saying that it is also an issue being discussed in the US after several US businesses were forced by Beijing to carry out undemocratic practices.
She warned Ma against misinterpreting his election win as a victory for his policies, since the election results showed that Taiwan is deeply divided with Ma and his opponent, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), both winning more than 6 million votes.
“If this was supposed to be Ma’s vindicating win, he should have fared better in the polls. His winning margin would not have slipped from 2.21 million votes in 2008 to 790,000 votes this year,” Liu said.
The legislative elections also reflected basic flaws of the current electoral system and the dire need for reform, said Lue Jen-der (呂建德), an associate professor at National Chung Cheng University.
The current single-member district system has resulted in unequal values of votes and the system has hampered the political rights of smaller parties and organizations, he said.
The coalition called for amending the Constitution to make Taiwan’s government a presidential or a parlimantary system, rather than the current system, and to increase the number of legislators-at-large, he said.
If this is too difficult, amending the election laws would immediately ensure fairer political participation as well, he said.
“We recommend lowering the threshold for parties to receive public subsidies; replacing the rights to register in elections by deposit with a petition; a transparent process of political advertisement purchasing; and organizing debates between various parties,” he said.
‘CROWN JEWEL’: Washington ‘can delay and deter’ Chinese President Xi Jinping’s plans for Taiwan, but it is ‘a very delicate situation there,’ the secretary of state said US President Donald Trump is opposed to any change to Taiwan’s “status quo” by force or extortion and would maintain that policy, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told the Hugh Hewitt Show host on Wednesday. The US’ policy is to maintain Taiwan’s “status quo” and to oppose any changes in the situation by force or extortion, Rubio said. Hewitt asked Rubio about the significance of Trump earlier this month speaking with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (台積電) chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家) at the White House, a meeting that Hewitt described as a “big deal.” Asked whether the meeting was an indication of the
‘RELATIVELY STRONG LANGUAGE’: An expert said the state department has not softened its language on China and was ‘probably a little more Taiwan supportive’ China’s latest drills near Taiwan on Monday were “brazen and irresponsible threats,” a US Department of State spokesperson said on Tuesday, while reiterating Washington’s decades-long support of Taipei. “China cannot credibly claim to be a ‘force for stability in a turbulent world’ while issuing brazen and irresponsible threats toward Taiwan,” the unnamed spokesperson said in an e-mailed response to media queries. Washington’s enduring commitment to Taiwan will continue as it has for 45 years and the US “will continue to support Taiwan in the face of China’s military, economic, informational and diplomatic pressure campaign,” the e-mail said. “Alongside our international partners, we firmly
KAOHSIUNG CEREMONY: The contract chipmaker is planning to build 5 fabs in the southern city to gradually expand its 2-nanometer chip capacity Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, yesterday confirmed that it plans to hold a ceremony on March 31 to unveil a capacity expansion plan for its most advanced 2-nanometer chips in Kaohsiung, demonstrating its commitment to further investment at home. The ceremony is to be hosted by TSMC cochief operating officer Y.P. Chyn (秦永沛). It did not disclose whether Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) and high-ranking government officials would attend the ceremony. More details are to be released next week, it said. The chipmaker’s latest move came after its announcement earlier this month of an additional US$100 billion
COUNTERING THE PLA: While the US should reinforce its relations with partners and allies, Taiwan must invest in strengthening its defenses as well, Phillip Davidson said If influence in the Indo-Pacific region is one of the US’ core interests, then Taiwan serves as a cornerstone of US economic and security influence in the region, former US Indo-Pacific Command commander admiral Phillip Davidson said on Thursday. “China’s ... strategy is to supplant the US leadership role in the international order ... and they’ve long said ... that they intend to do that by 2050,” Davidson told the National Review Institute’s Ideas Summit in Washington. Davidson said he had previously told US Senate hearings on China’s military activities and possible threats in the Indo-Pacific region that a Chinese invasion of