The nomination of Taiwan as a candidate for the US’ Visa Waiver Program (VWP) showed the US government has a high degree of confidence in President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Tung Kuoyu (董國猷) said yesterday.
While the nomination came about mainly because Taiwan has met all the eligibility requirements for visa-free travel to the US, he added that “it was also undeniable that the progress was attributed to a high level of mutual trust between both governments.”
“No matter how much you have done, the result would not have happened without the existence of mutual trust,” Tung said at a press conference hosted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus at the legislature.
Photo: CNA
The announcement that Taiwan has been nominated by the US Department of State as a VWP candidate, made three weeks ahead of the presidential election on Jan. 14, has sparked concerns that it could influence the KMT’s electoral outlook.
American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Acting Director Eric Madison on Thursday dismissed those concerns, saying the US judged visa waivers purely on the merits of statutory requirements rather than any other factors and that the announcement was made because Taiwan had recently fulfilled the requirements.
However, several KMT lawmakers yesterday touted the Ma administration’s achievements in winning the visa-free privilege that the US is considering and 124 countries and regions have extended to Taiwanese.
KMT Legislator Pan Wei-kang (潘維剛) said the number of countries and regions to which Taiwanese can travel without a visa remained at 54 under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) during former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) eight-year tenure, while the number has increased to 124 under Ma.
“After the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, the US has been especially cautious about entry into the country. That it would like to include Taiwan in its VWP suggests that Taiwan is a trustworthy country,” she said.
“The achievement has made our passports even more valuable and made Taiwanese more respected,” she said.
KMT Legislator Lin Yu-fang (林郁方) said the nomination was like a “cardiac stimulant needle the US injected Ma with” that gave Ma an advantage against DPP presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in the election.
“The death of Kim Jong-il has brought about an unclear situation for North Korea. Under that situation, the US wished to see stability in Taiwan’s politics and in cross-strait relations,” Lin said.
The nomination showed that the US considers Ma to be more capable of maintaining cross-strait stability, Lin said.
Commenting on that interpretation of the VWP nomination, Edward Chen (陳一新), a professor at the Graduate Institute of the Americas at Tamkang University, said that the timing of the announcement “carried political connotations.”
“Although the US has said repeatedly that it has no preference among the two candidates, its policies have suggested otherwise. The US is still suspicious of Tsai, mainly because of her cross-strait policies,” Chen said.
The spate of visits by US high-level officials in the past three months, including US Assistant Secretary of Commerce Suresh Kumar, US Agency for International Development administrator Rajiv Shah and US Deputy Secretary of Energy Daniel Poneman, the recent statement made by US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton at the APEC summit and the VWP progress dispelled rumors that the US distrusted Ma owing to his conciliatory cross-strait policies, Chen said.
Joseph Wu (吳釗燮), a research fellow at the Institute of International Relations at National Chengchi University and the country’s former representative to the US in 2007 and 2008, disagreed, saying the US did not act inconsistently with its promise to maintain neutrality on Taiwan’s election.
“The AIT has said that the nomination has nothing to do with the election,” he said.
The efforts to push for the inclusion of Taiwan in the VWP stretch back to the end of 2007, with various rounds of talks held between high-ranking Taiwanese officials and their counterparts at the US Department of State, the US National Security Council and the US Department of Homeland Security before the DPP left office, Wu said.
Other than the talks, officials from both sides had inspected security and immigration facilities in the other side’s country and were close to completing negotiations on certain agreements needed to be signed to fulfill VWP requirements, he said.
Wu added that he had reservations about the comments made by Tung.
“In my view, the former DPP administration built a solid foundation,” Wu said.
“The nomination was actually a belated progress. Taiwan would have been nominated earlier if the KMT administration had worked harder,” he said.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or