President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) repeated lies about the existence of the so-called “1992 consensus” are a “disgrace to Taiwan’s democracy,” former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) said yesterday in a press release.
The statement came in response to comments by Ma on Thursday in which he said that the “1992 consensus” was formulated under Lee’s directive during his presidency and that it was in line with the Constitution.
Lee yesterday reiterated that the consensus never existed and said Ma has continued to lie to the public.
“I have said dozens of times publicly that there was no consensus reached in 1992. Late Straits Exchange Foundation [SEF] chairman Koo Chen-fu (辜振甫) said there was no consensus and former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted that he coined the phrase,” Lee’s statement said.
“However, President Ma has continued to advocate the ‘1992 consensus’ and has tried to deceive Taiwanese,” it added. “Does he think that a lie will become the truth if you tell the lie a hundred times? This has caused serious harm and is a disgrace to Taiwan’s democracy.”
Ma on Thursday defended the “1992 consensus,” saying that the consensus was reached on Aug. 1, 1992, during a meeting of the National Unification Commission (NUC) presided over by Lee and that “one China” refers to the Republic of China.
According to Ma, at the NUC meeting Lee defined “one China” as “the People’s Republic of China on the mainland and the Republic of China on Taiwan” and the definition later became the basis of the principle “one China, with different interpretations.”
“History can not be fabricated and altered, and only a tyrant would fabricate historical facts,” Lee said in the statement yesterday, adding that Ma should not lie because Lee is still alive to refute the lies.
Beijing defines the “1992 consensus” as “one China” only, the former president added, while Ma defined the consensus as “one China, with different interpretations.”
Ma’s re-election office yesterday dismissed Lee’s criticism and insisted on the existence of the “1992 consensus.”
Ma’s campaign spokesperson Lee Chia-fei (李佳霏) said Ma has clearly said the consensus was based on the 1992 NUC meeting.
“The president’s remarks are based on facts and historical facts won’t change because politicians’ change their stance,” she said.
Ma said that Lee presided over the meeting in preparation for cross-strait negotiations between the SEF and the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS) in October 1992 in Hong Kong and, despite the fact that no concrete results were reached during the negotiations, the SEF and ARATS agreed that each side could have its own interpretation of “one China.”
Additional reporting by Mo Yan-chih
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS