Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) yesterday accused President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of resorting to “character assassination” to win next month’s presidential election by accusing her of profiteering from an investment deal when she served in the government.
At an impromptu press conference in Greater Tainan, Tsai said she and her family had never received improper benefits from Yu Chang Biologics Co (宇昌生技股份有限公司), a biotech start-up, and her integrity has always been unquestionable.
“I want to ask President Ma: Is it necessary for this kind of campaign? Is it necessary to do whatever it takes, including throwing mud at other candidates and resorting to character assassination to win the election and cover up the failures of your administration?” Tsai said.
Photo: Taipei Times
KMT lawmakers on Thursday accused Tsai of a conflict of interest because of her involvement with Yu Chang after she left office in August 2007, which received investment from the state-owned National Development Fund (NDF).
The KMT said Tsai, who later served as chairperson of Yu Chang, received NT$100 million (US$3.3 million) when she sold her shares in the company in 2009.
Tsai yesterday said the case had been thoroughly scrutinized in the past three years and no inappropriate practices have been found, adding that while she promoted the biotech industry when she was vice premier, she was never involved with Yu Chang.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
Tsai said she agreed to be chairperson of Yu Chang after being invited by several scientists, who persuaded her that her expertise in negotiation and fundraising would help the company.
Her family businesses invested in Yu Chang because of a lack of funding in the initial stage, Tsai said, adding that she had promised to withdraw the investment once sufficient private funding was in place, which she did.
“Neither myself nor my family received extortionate profits from the investment. Instead, the government received a profit of NT$1 billion,” she said.
The administrative branch, certain legislators and some media outlets have collaborated in a smear campaign that only disclosed selective information and made false accusations, she said.
Former Council for Economic Planning and Development chairperson Ho Mei-yueh (何美玥) offered her side of story in a separate press conference in Taipei.
Ho said the KMT had -misinterpreted some details. This included a document showing the NDF’s investment in Yu Chang that was classified as top secret, Ho said. This was done because it involved information surrounding the company’s negotiation with the US pharmaceutical company Genentech, which was seeking a foreign partner at the time, not because of secret maneuvers by Tsai, she said.
“The document can be declassified anytime after the collaboration agreement has been signed,” she added.
The NFD had invested in several companies that held national strategic significance, such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vanguard International Semiconductor, Chunghwa Telecom and Changhua Bank, through “special investment projects,” DPP lawyer Hsu Kuo-yong (徐國勇) said.
This showed that the NDF’s investment in Yu Chang was not a special case, Hsu said, adding that the government increased its investment in Yu Chang last year by NT$137 million.
“If [Yu Chang] was a bad investment, the Ma administration would not have increased its investment,” Hsu said.
DPP spokesperson Chuang Ruei-hsiung (莊瑞雄) added that the DPP did not think Tsai had violated the “revolving-door” regulation when assuming the chair of Yu Chang after leaving office, according to the interpretation of the Executive Yuan’s Legal Affairs Committee.
If the KMT’s accusation is proved legitimate, Chuang said, there would be more than a few former government officials who were in violation of the regulation.
Additional reporting by Mo Yan-chih
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or