Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers yesterday accused Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of a conflict of interest because of her involvement with a biotech start-up after leaving office that received investment from the state-owned National Development Fund. They demanded that documents relating to the investment be made public immediately.
According to fund data, on Feb. 15, 2007 then-Council for Economic Planning and Development chairperson and NDF convener Ho Mei-yueh (何美玥) sent documents labeled classified to then-premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) and then-vice premier Tsai for approval, stating that under certain conditions, the fund would invest US$20 million in a company that would work with US firm Genentech.
The committee managing the fund passed an incidental motion on April 17 that it would retain the Feb. 15 document for future reference, the fund’s data showed.
On Aug. 31 the same year, Tsai sent a letter to the fund asking it to wire NT$40 million to the account of the “Taimao Protein Technology Co Preparatory Office (台懋蛋白胜科技股份有限公司)” before Sept. 3. Another letter was sent on the same day saying the company’s name had been changed to “Yu Chang Biologics Co (宇昌生技股份有限公司),” repeating the request for the fund to wire NT$40 million to the account of Yu Chang Biologics Co Preparatory Office.
Yu Chang Biologics Co was registered and established on Sept. 5, 2007, with Tsai as its chairperson and the fund took three seats of the seven that made up the company’s board of directorates.
On April 28 2009, Yu Chang Biologics Co changed its name to TaiMed Biologics Co (中裕新藥股份有限公司) and was approved on June 18 last year to register its emerging stocks on the over-the-counter (OTC) board of listed companies.
The legislature’s Economics Committee, where the KMT holds a majority, late yesterday passed a resolution asking the fund to declassify within the week all classified materials concerning the investment in the TaiMed Biologics Co and send the files to the committee for review.
Article 14 Section 1 of the Civil Servant Services Act (公務員服務法) stipulates that civil servants are not allowed, within three years of their resignation, to hold the position of chairperson, supervisor or manager at any company with which they had dealings at any time five years prior to their resignation.
KMT Legislator Ting Shou-chung (丁守中) quoted media reports accusing Tsai of having deliberately sought to enrich herself during her tenure as vice premier by asking the fund to invest in a company of which she later became chairperson.
During the questioning, National Development Fund convener Christina Liu (劉憶如) declined to speculate as to whether Tsai violated the “revolving door” clause, saying she would let officials in charge of that section explain the matter.
In response to KMT allegation that by serving as a chairperson of TaiMed Biologics prior to being appointed DPP chairperson, Tsai violated the “revolving door” clause, DPP spokesperson Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said that Tsai did not violate the clause, according to a detailed explanation of the article in question by the Ministry of Civil Service and the Executive Yuan’s Rules and Regulations Commission in 1996 and 2008.
On the charge that Tsai received NT$100 million in profits from selling her shares in TaiMed Biologics Co, Chen said Tsai became chairperson of TaiMed Biologics Co at the invitation of scientists David Ho (何大一), Wong Chi-huey (翁啟惠) and Chen Lan-bo (陳良博), three months after she quit her position as vice premier.
Tsai was invited because she had experience negotiating with other organizations and it was hoped that her appointment would help in negotiations with Genentech on authorization for new HIV/AIDS medication. It was also hoped that Tsai would help raise funds within the nation and help promote the development of the biotech industry, Chen Chi-mai said.
It was to help the development of the biotech industry that Tsai agreed to become chairperson and she also helped out with fundraising for the company, Chen Chi-mai said, adding that it was only then that the Executive Yuan agreed to invest the remaining 40 percent of the funding through the fund.
“The KMT’s allegations that Tsai received NT$100 million for selling her shares is completely untrue,” Chen said.
He further questioned why the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) invested NT$137 million in TaiMed Biologics Co last year if the company was “shady.” After investing NT$400 million in the company, the government made a profit of NT$1 billion.
DPP caucus whip Tsai Huang-liang (蔡煌瑯) said he suspected the KMT caucus arranged for the Economics Committee to raise the issue of the TaiMed Biologics Co investment to undermine Tsai’s campaign efforts.
In response, KMT caucus whip Lin Yi-shih (林益世) said that no one could tell whether the fund’s investment in TaiMed Biologics Co was practical, adding the KMT sought only insight into the issue by making the data more transparent and available to the public.
“The DPP’s criticism that this is slander only goes to show it has skeletons in its closet,” Lin said.
Translated by Jake Chung, Staff Writer
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS