Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) added to the chorus of heavy criticism of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) proposal to sign a peace agreement with China, as he said yesterday it posed a grave risk to national sovereignty.
“Politically speaking, Ma’s proposal to sign a cross-strait peace accord is another step toward pandering to [Beijing’s] ‘one China’ framework, which could lead to the greatest crisis Taiwan’s sovereignty has faced since its democratization,” Lee said in a written speech that was read out by former Academia Historica president Chan Yen-hsien (張炎憲) at a forum held by the Taiwan Brain Trust think tank in Taipei.
Lee was unable to attend the forum because he had been released from hospital just the day before after recuperating for almost three weeks from surgery for colon cancer.
In the speech, Lee also expressed thanks to the public for their concerns over his health.
Lee said in the speech, titled “Surpassing the Crisis of Foreign and Domestic Dangers Posed to Taiwanese Democracy,” that in the past three years, the Ma administration has increasingly been leaning toward China, saying it was plunging Taiwan into the “one China” maelstrom and binding the foundations of the Taiwanese economy to China based on the non-existent basis of the so-called “1992 consensus.”
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) claims the consensus was an agreement reached by Taipei and Beijing in 1992 that there is just “one China, with each side having its own interpretation,” whereas late Straits Exchange Foundation chairman Koo Chen-foo (辜振甫), who participated in the negotiations in 1992, and Lee had denied the existence of such a consensus.
In the speech, Lee also criticized the Ma administration over its signing of the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) last year, saying that not only has Taiwan not signed more free-trade agreements with other countries as the Ma administration had said it would, but that Taiwan has also seen a decrease in both domestic and foreign investment inside the country.
Pointing to the history of Taiwan’s democratization, Lee said Taiwan was already a sovereign, independent country and was also a democratic country in which power rested with the people. The relationship between Taiwan and China has proceeded on a nation-to-nation basis since the Constitution was amended in 1991, he said.
At the very least, their relationship had a special nation-to-nation basis, Lee said, adding that it was not a domestic relationship under the “one China [framework].”
Lee said the Ma administration was taking away Taiwan’s sovereignty by calling the cross-strait relationship a “special relationship,” adding that this sort of “self-negation” not only amounted to treason, but also exceeded the president’s powers.
The people absolutely did not give the government they voted in the power to “take away the sovereignty of Taiwan,” Lee said.
Lee also stressed that the sovereignty of Taiwan was an international issue and the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait could not be unilaterally changed.
“The KMT and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP] should not think their closed-door negotiations on the future of Taiwan can pass unnoticed and unhindered, because such closed-door negotiations are a unilateral decision to change the ‘status quo’ in the Taiwan Strait,” Lee said.
“The relevant benefits of the situation in the Taiwan Strait not only concerns both sides of the Strait, but also neighboring nations,” Lee said, adding: “Such benefits cannot be decided in private by the KMT and the CCP.”
Lee added that the January presidential election will be a turning point for Taiwan and that “‘abandoning Ma to save Taiwan’ is the most direct action toward saving Taiwan.”
Translated by Jake Chung, staff writer
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or