The Presidential Office and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday denied President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) met privately with one of the nation’s most powerful bookmakers in September, insisting that the president has handled all political donations in accordance with the regulations.
The Chinese-language Next Magazine yesterday reported that Ma held a closed-door meeting with bookie Chen Ying-chu (陳盈助) in Chiayi on Sept. 10 when campaigning in the city. According to the magazine, Chen is allegedly in charge of major underground betting activities on local elections.
The meeting, arranged by Chiayi Mayor Huang Ming-hui (黃敏惠), was held at her residence and Ma asked for a political donation of NT$300 million (US$9 million), the magazine reported.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
Presidential Office spokesman Fan Chiang Tai-chi (范姜泰基) said Ma did not make a private visit to Huang’s residence during his trip to Chiayi that day and there have been no under-the-table political donations.
He said Ma had only met Chen twice — in January 2008 and in 2009 prior to local elections, and the two meetings were held as part of normal visits to grassroots organizations.
“There’s no such thing as a political donation from Chen. President Ma has handled all political donations during elections in accordance with related regulations,” he said.
Huang also denied arranging a meeting between Ma and Chen, but stopped short of threatening legal action against the magazine.
“[The story] is nonsense. How can the magazine fabricate a story like this? President Ma did not visit my residence,” she said.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said that Ma was obligated to explain the alleged meeting to the public, both as president and as a candidate.
“President Ma should answer questions about whether he sought ‘systematic support’ for campaign funding and mobilization,” DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) told reporters.
At a press conference, DPP spokespeople questioned Ma’s objective in the alleged September meeting, saying that it would be a scandal in any democratic country if the president intended to manipulate elections using a bookmaker.
“We have four questions for President Ma: Did you meet the bookmaker? Did you accept his NT$300 million donation? Were you intending to manipulate the election results through bookmaking? How much money has your aide, King Pu-tsung (金溥聰), and your sister, Ma Yi-nan (馬以南), received from the bookie?” DPP spokesperson Chuang Ruei-hsiung (莊瑞雄) said.
Nobody would have believed that the KMT had a funding problem, with its party assets worth tens of billions of dollars, Chuang said, adding that the meeting between Ma and Chen could be “an attempt to influence the result of the election through bookmaking.”
Ma should explain how many times he and his aides had met Chen and why they always met with the bookmaker before major elections — the 2008 presidential election, the 2009 local elections and the Jan. 14 presidential election, Chuang said.
If Ma’s campaign had tried to influence voting behavior by manipulating the betting spread, it would be a violation of the election law, DPP spokesperson Liang Wen-jie (梁文傑) said.
While Ma prides his own integrity, several cases uncovered by the media recently have challenged that claim, DPP spokesperson Kang Yu-cheng (康裕成) said.
Ma Yi-nan reportedly received a political donation of NT$20 million from Chang An-le (張安樂), a reputed gang leader, in 2008 and was found to have met with Chen several times, according to the Next report, Kang said, adding that Ma’s Chiayi campaign headquarters building was owned by Chen’s aide.
DPP legislators Chen Ting-fei (陳亭妃) and Lin Shu-fen (林淑芬) also urged Ma to offer a clear explanation of the alleged meeting with Chen, saying that “it would be ironic for Ma, who always says he is an ‘anti-black gold’ politician, to be secretly meeting mafia members.”
Ma’s re-election campaign spokesman Yin Wei (殷瑋) said Chuang and Liang were making accusations against Ma without having any evidence.
KMT spokesperson Lai Su-ju (賴素如) said Ma and the party had no immediate plan to sue the magazine, but called on the magazine to print a correction.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS